Promoting speaking‐up behaviours among nurses working in the care for older people: A scoping review

Author:

Austen Katrina1ORCID,Hutchinson Marie1ORCID,Hurley John1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Southern Cross University Coffs Harbour New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo explore interventions employed to foster speaking‐up behaviours of registered nurses (RNs) working in the care of older people.DesignScoping review.MethodsThe updated Joann Briggs Institute scoping review methodological guidelines were followed.Data SourcesCINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched.ResultsA total of 1691 titles and abstracts were screened, resulting in 11 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Analysis focused upon intervention types, methodologies, speaking up strategies, barriers and effectiveness. Education was the most used intervention.ConclusionThere is a lack of published research on successful interventions to promote speaking‐up behaviours in the care of older people, particularly relating to poor care practices. Evidence of speaking‐up interventions in the residential aged care setting is absent. This highlights the need to develop strategies to support the RN to lead and enable others to raise care concerns.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareDeveloping strategies that enable staff, care recipients and their families to speak up about care concerns is a vital future area for nursing practice development. Nursing leadership of such strategies is central to improving the quality of care for older people, particularly those living in residential aged care.ImpactOlder people receiving care should feel respected and be treated humanely. Evidence suggests this is often not the case. This review found a paucity of interventions to promote speaking‐up about poor care practices among RNs working in the care of older people. Future research needs to address this, to empower RNs and improve the care afforded to older people.Reporting MethodThe PRISMA‐ScR (Tricco et al., Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 467–473, 2018) were adhered to throughout this scoping review.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution in this review.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference66 articles.

1. Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Amendment. (2022).Code of Conduct and Banning Orders Rules.https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022L01457

2. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

3. An aged life has less value: A qualitative analysis of moral disengagement and care failures evident in Royal Commission oral testimony

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3