Affiliation:
1. SPHERE, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence, Department of General Practice Monash University Notting Hill Victoria Australia
2. Family Planning NSW Sydney New South Wales Australia
Abstract
AbstractAimTo synthesise and map current evidence on nurse and midwife involvement in task‐sharing service delivery, including both face‐to‐face and telehealth models, in primary care.DesignThis scoping review was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Methodology for Scoping Reviews.Data Source/Review MethodsFive databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 16 January 2024, and articles were screened for inclusion in Covidence by three authors. Findings were mapped according to the research questions and review outcomes such as characteristics of models, health and economic outcomes, and the feasibility and acceptability of nurse‐led models.ResultsOne hundred peer‐reviewed articles (as 99 studies) were deemed eligible for inclusion. Task‐sharing models existed for a range of conditions, particularly diabetes and hypertension. Nurse‐led models allowed nurses to work to the extent of their practice scope, were acceptable to patients and providers, and improved health outcomes. Models can be cost‐effective, and increase system efficiencies with supportive training, clinical set‐up and regulatory systems. Some limitations to telehealth models are described, including technological issues, time burden and concerns around accessibility for patients with lower technological literacy.ConclusionNurse‐led models can improve health, economic and service delivery outcomes in primary care and are acceptable to patients and providers. Appropriate training, funding and regulatory systems are essential for task‐sharing models with nurses to be feasible and effective.ImpactNurse‐led models are one strategy to improve health equity and access; however, there is a scarcity of literature on what these models look like and how they work in the primary care setting. Evidence suggests these models can also improve health outcomes, are perceived to be feasible and acceptable, and can be cost‐effective. Increased utilisation of nurse‐led models should be considered to address health system challenges and improve access to essential primary healthcare services globally.Reporting MethodThis review is reported against the PRISMA‐ScR criteria.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.Protocol registrationThe study protocol is published in BJGP Open (Moulton et al., 2022).
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Reference151 articles.
1. Practice nurses and sexual health care: Enhancing team care within general practice;Abbott P.;Australian Family Physician,2013
2. Screening diabetic and hypertensive patients for ocular pathology using telemedicine technology in rural West Virginia: A retrospective chart review;Ahmed R.;The West Virginia Medical Journal,2013
3. Development of a Smartphone‐Enabled Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management Package to Facilitate Evidence‐Based Care Delivery in Primary Healthcare Facilities in India: The mPower Heart Project
4. COVID-19 Telemedicine and Vaccination at an Urban Safety Net HIV Medicine Clinic
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献