Scrutinizing the impact of policy instruments on adoption of agricultural conservation practices using Bayesian expert models

Author:

Dean Angela J1234ORCID,Eberhard Rachel56,Baresi Umberto5ORCID,Coggan Anthea7,Deane Felicity8,Hamman Evan8,Helmstedt Kate J.910,Loechel Barton7ORCID,Jarvis Diane11ORCID,Mayfield Helen910,Stevens Lillian5ORCID,Taylor Bruce7,Vella Karen5

Affiliation:

1. Centre for the Environment, School of Biology and Environmental Science Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia

2. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St Lucia Australia

3. School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability The University of Queensland Gatton Australia

4. School of the Environment The University of Queensland St Lucia Australia

5. School of Architecture and Built Environmental Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia

6. Eberhard Consulting Brisbane Australia

7. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Brisbane Australia

8. School of Law Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia

9. School of Mathematical Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia

10. Centre for Data Science Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia

11. College of Business, Law and Governance James Cook University Townsville Australia

Abstract

AbstractPolicy instruments—such as regulation, financial incentives, and agricultural extension—are commonly applied by governments to promote sustainable agricultural practices and tackle ecosystem degradation. Despite substantial investment, little data are available to gauge the impact of evolving policy mixes. We constructed a Bayesian network model to explore relationships between policy instruments, contextual factors, and adoption. Applying a series of scenarios, we present examples of how different instruments influence adoption and how their effectiveness is shaped by contextual factors. Scenarios highlight that the effect of policy instruments is often modest, and constrained by diverse practice and population characteristics. These findings allow us to reflect on the role of policy instruments, and the conditions necessary to support practice change. For example, our findings raise questions about the role of financial benefits versus financial capacity, and highlight the potential importance of concepts such as mental bandwidth in shaping both motivation and capacity to adopt.

Funder

Queensland Government

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3