Economics of conservation law enforcement by rangers across Asia

Author:

Farhadinia Mohammad S.12,Johnson Paul J.3,Kamath Vignesh4,Eid Ehab5,Hikmani Hadi Al6,Ambarlı Hüseyin78,Alom Zahangir9,Askerov Elshad10,Buchakiet Polawee1112,Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar13,Gavashelishvili Alexander14,Tsiklauri Khatuna15,Gritsina Mariya A.16,Haidir Iding17,Htun Saw18,Kabir Muhammad19,Khanal Gopal20,Kittle Andrew21,Koshkin Maxim A.22,Kulenbekov Rahim22,Kubanychbekov Zairbek22,Lynam Antony23,Maheshwari Aishwarya24,Penjor Ugyen325,Rasphone Akchousanh26,Raza Hana27,Redford Tim28,Rizayeva Afag2930,Rosen Tatjana31,Weinberg Pavel32,Yachmennikova Anna33,Yamaguchi Nobuyuki34,Macdonald David W.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology and Oxford Martin School University of Oxford Oxford UK

2. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Kent UK

3. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK

4. UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP‐WCMC) Cambridge UK

5. IUCN SSC Steering Committee Members Amman Jordan

6. Office for Conservation of the Environment Diwan of Royal Court Muscat Oman

7. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Forestry Duzce University Duzce Turkey

8. Terrestrial Ecology Research Group Technical University of Munich Freising Germany

9. Wildlife Conservation Society Dhaka Bangladesh

10. The Institute of Zoology of Azerbaijan NAS Baku Azerbaijan

11. Umphang Wildlife Sanctuary Nong Luang Thailand

12. Thai Rangers Association Bangkok Thailand

13. Mongolia Program Wildlife Conservation Society Ulaanbaatar Mongolia

14. Center of Biodiversity Studies, Institute of Ecology Ilia State University Tbilisi Georgia

15. National Environment Agency of Georgia Ministry of Environment and Agriculture of Georgia Poti Georgia

16. Institute of Zoology Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan Tashkent Uzbekistan

17. Directorate of Planning and Information of Conservation Areas Ministry of Environment and Forestry Central Jakarta Indonesia

18. Myanmar Biodiversity Fund Yangon Myanmar

19. Wildlife Ecology Lab, Department of Forestry & Wildlife Management University of Haripur Haripur Pakistan

20. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of Forests and Environment Government of Nepal, Singha Durbar Kathmandu Nepal

21. The Wilderness & Wildlife Conservation Trust Sri Lanka

22. Ilbirs Foundation Bishkek Kyrgyzstan

23. Wildlife Conservation Society Center for Global Conservation New York New York USA

24. Vasundhara Sector 5 Uttar Pradesh Ghaziabad India

25. Fauna and Flora International Cambridge UK

26. Wildlife Conservation Society Lao PDR Program, Lao PDR Vientiane Lao Peoples Democratic Repblc

27. Leopards Beyond Borders Sulaimani‐Kurdistan Region Iraq

28. Freeland Foundation Bangkok Thailand

29. SILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin‐Madison Wisconsin Madison USA

30. Department of Bioecology Baku State University Baku Azerbaijan

31. Caucasus Nature Fund Tbilisi Georgia

32. North‐Ossetian State Nature Reserve RSO‐Alania Alagir Russia

33. A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Russia

34. Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Development Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Kuala Terengganu Malaysia

Abstract

AbstractBiodiversity targets, under the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, prioritize both conservation area and their effectiveness. The effective management of protected areas (PAs) depends greatly on law enforcement resources, which is often tasked to rangers. We addressed economic aspects of law enforcement by rangers working in terrestrial landscapes across Asia. Accordingly, we used ranger numbers and payment rates to derive continental‐scale estimates. Ranger density has decreased by 2.4‐fold since the 1990s, increasing the median from 10.9 to 26.4 km2 of PAs per ranger. Rangers were generally paid more than the minimum wage (median ratio = 1.9) and the typical salaries in agriculture, forestry, and fishing sector (median ratio = 1.2). Annual spending on ranger salaries varied widely among countries, with a median of annual US71 km−2 of PA. Nearly 208,000 rangers patrolling Asian PAs provide an invaluable opportunity to develop ranger‐based monitoring plans for evaluating the conservation performance. As decision‐makers frequently seek an optimum number of law enforcement staff, our study provides a continental baseline median of 46.3 km2 PA per ranger. Our findings also provide a baseline for countries to improve their ranger‐based law enforcement which is critical for their Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets.

Funder

Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3