Methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life: A systematic review of qualitative and textual evidence

Author:

Vlckova Karolina12ORCID,Gonella Silvia34,Bavelaar Laura5,Mitchell Gary6,Sussman Tamara7

Affiliation:

1. Center for Palliative Care Prague The Czech Republic

2. Third Faculty of Medicine Prague The Czech Republic

3. Department of Public Health and Pediatrics University of Torino Torino Italy

4. Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza of Torino Torino Italy

5. Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

6. School of Nursing and Midwifery Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK

7. School of Social Work McGill University Montreal Canada

Abstract

AbstractAimThis systematic review aims to identify methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life from the perspective of researchers and provide a set of recommendations.BackgroundConducting research with patients and family carers facing end‐of‐life issues is ethically and methodologically complex.DesignA systematic review was conducted.Data sourcesFour databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) were searched from inception until the end of 2021 in February 2022.Review methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews was followed, and the JBI Approach to qualitative synthesis was used for analysis.ResultsSeventeen of 1983 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were distilled to six main themes. These included (1) the need for flexibility at all stages of the research process; (2) careful attention to timing; (3) sensitivity in approach; (4) the importance of stakeholder collaboration; (5) the need for unique researcher skills; and (6) the need to deal with the issue of missing data.ConclusionThe findings illuminate several considerations that can inform training programmes, ethical review processes and research designs when embarking on research in this field.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy

ZonMw

Health Research Board

Alzheimer's Society

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3