Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up

Published:2017-04-30 Issue:5 Volume:120 Page:651-658
ISSN:1464-4096
Container-title:BJU International
language:en
Short-container-title:BJU Int

Author:

Grogan Judith¹,Gupta Ruta¹²³,Mahon Kate L.¹⁴,Stricker Phillip D.⁵,Haynes Anne-Maree¹,Delprado Warick⁶⁷,Turner Jennifer⁶⁷,Horvath Lisa G.¹³⁴,Kench James G.¹²³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Research Program; Kinghorn Cancer Centre/Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Darlinghurst NSW Australia

2. Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney NSW Australia

3. Sydney Medical School; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia

4. Department of Medical Oncology; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse; Camperdown NSW Australia

5. Department of Urology; St Vincent's Hospital; Sydney NSW Australia

6. Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology; Sydney NSW Australia

7. Australian School of Advanced Medicine; Macquarie University; Sydney NSW Australia

Funder

Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government

National Health and Medical Research Council

Cancer Institute NSW

The Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre (NSW)

Prostate Cancer Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/bju.13857/fullpdf

Reference26 articles.

1. Classification of prostatic carcinomas;Gleason;Cancer Chemother Rep,1966

2. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma;Epstein;Am J Surg Pathol,2005

3. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system;Epstein;Am J Surg Pathol,2016

4. The value of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modified Gleason grading system as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy;Billis;Int Urol Nephrol,2014

5. Changes in Gleason score grading and their effect in predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy;Tsivian;Urology,2009

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Navigating the evolving diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer;Asian Journal of Andrology;2024-05-03

2. Temporal trend in risk of prostate cancer death in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer;Scandinavian Journal of Urology;2024-04-29

3. Genetic ancestry and radical prostatectomy findings in Hispanic/Latino patients;Frontiers in Oncology;2024-04-03

4. Long term evaluation of optimized Gleason grading in a large cohort of men with prostate cancer in Canada;Human Pathology;2024-04

5. Radical prostatectomy cancer grade and percentage of Gleason pattern 4 estimated by global vs individual tumor grading correlate differently with the risk of biochemical recurrence in Grade Group 2 and 3 cancers;American Journal of Clinical Pathology;2024-02-27