Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to the prone positioning of patients among intensive care unit nurses working in COVID‐19 units: A cross‐sectional study in China

Author:

Chen Xiuwen12ORCID,Zhou Yang12,Zhou Xia1,Su Pan1,Yi Jindong1

Affiliation:

1. Teaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing Xiangya Hospital of Central South University Changsha China

2. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAn increasing number of studies persistently demonstrate that prone position ventilation can significantly improve the oxygenation index and blood oxygen saturation for most patients (70–80%) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Studies have also shown that the awake prone position was both safe and effective in helping patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) breathe spontaneously. However, the prone position is not widely adopted when treating patients with COVID‐19 or ARDS from other causes. Basic knowledge, positive attitudes, and correct practices among the nursing staff are necessary to increase the use of prone positions, reduce the incidence of complications associated with prone positions, and improve the quality and safety of health care.AimThis study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone positioning of patients among intensive care unit (ICU) nurses working in COVID‐19 units and provide suggestions for improvement.Study designICU nurses were recruited from two designated tertiary hospitals for COVID‐19 treatment in Shanghai, China, in April 2022, using convenience sampling. A questionnaire survey focusing on the dimensions of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of the prone position with 42 items, was conducted.ResultsA total of 132 ICU nurses participated. The scores on the overall questionnaire and the dimensions of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone position were 167.28 (95% CI, 161.70–172.86), 78.35 (95% CI, 76.04–80.66), 32.08 (95% CI, 31.51–32.65), and 56.85 (95% CI, 52.42–61.28) respectively. The overall average score was 79.66% (95% CI, 0.77–0.82). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that prior experience in treating patients with COVID‐19 and professional titles were related to the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone position.ConclusionsThe ICU nurses strongly believed in the effectiveness of prone positioning, but their knowledge and practice levels need improvement. The experience in treating patients with COVID‐19 and professional titles were related to the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practice of prone position. Nursing managers should ensure that ICU nurses are well trained in prone positioning and help enhance the knowledge and attitudes toward prone positioning to promote its widespread use.Relevance to clinical practiceClinical guidelines and in‐service training modules need to be developed to promote the use of prone positioning and reduce prone position‐related complications.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Critical Care Nursing

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3