Barriers and enablers for safe medication administration in adult and neonatal intensive care units mapped to the behaviour change wheel

Author:

Dick‐Smith Felicity1,Fry Margaret Fry23ORCID,Salter Rachel1,Tinker Matthew1,Leith Grace1,Donoghoe Stephanie1,Harris Claire3,Murphy Sandra3,Elliott Rosalind123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Royal North Shore Hospital Northern Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Faculty of Health University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia

3. Nursing and Midwifery Directorate Northern Sydney Local Health District St Leonards New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIntensive care settings have high rates of medication administration errors. Medications are often administered by nurses and midwives using a specified process (the ‘5 rights’). Understanding where medication errors occur, the contributing factors and how best practice is delivered may assist in developing interventions to improve medication safety.AimsTo identify medication administration errors and context specific barriers and enablers for best practice in an adult and a neonatal intensive care unit. Secondary aims were to identify intervention functions (through the Behaviour Change Wheel).Study DesignA dual methods exploratory descriptive study was conducted (May to June 2021) in a mixed 56‐bedded adult intensive care unit and a 6‐bedded neonatal intensive care unit in Sydney, Australia.Incident monitoring data were examined. Direct semi‐covert observational medication administration audits using the 5 rights (n = 39) were conducted. Brief interviews with patients, parents and nurses were conducted. Data were mapped to the Behaviour Change Wheel.ResultsNo medication administration incidents were recorded. Audits (n = 3) for the neonatal intensive care unit revealed no areas for improvement. Adult intensive care unit nurses (n = 36) performed checks for the right medication 35 times (97%) and patient identity 25 times (69%). Sixteen administrations (44%) were interrupted. Four themes were synthesized from the interview data: Trust in the nursing profession; Availability of policies and procedures; Adherence to the ‘5 rights’ and departmental culture; and Adequate staffing. The interventional functions most likely to bring about behaviour change were environmental restructuring, enablement, restrictions, education, persuasion and modelling.ConclusionsThis study reveals insights about the medication administration practices of nurses in intensive care. Although there were areas for improvement there was widespread awareness among nurses regarding their responsibilities to safely administer medications. Interview data indicated high levels of trust among patients and parents in the nurses.Relevance to clinical practiceThis novel study indicated that nurses in intensive care are aware of their responsibilities to safely administer medications. Mapping of contextual data to the Behaviour Change Wheel resulted in the identification of Intervention functions most likely to change medication administration practices in the adult intensive care setting that is environmental restructuring, enablement, restrictions, education, persuasion and modelling.

Funder

NSW Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Critical Care Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3