Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA USA
2. Departments of Radiology, Urology, and Radiation Oncology University of Washington Seattle WA USA
Abstract
ObjectivesTo explore the topic of Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) interobserver variability, including a discussion of major sources, mitigation approaches, and future directions.MethodsA narrative review of PI‐RADS interobserver variability.ResultsPI‐RADS was developed in 2012 to set technical standards for prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reduce interobserver variability at interpretation, and improve diagnostic accuracy in the MRI‐directed diagnostic pathway for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. While PI‐RADS has been validated in selected research cohorts with prostate cancer imaging experts, subsequent prospective studies in routine clinical practice demonstrate wide variability in diagnostic performance. Radiologist and biopsy operator experience are the most important contributing drivers of high‐quality care among multiple interrelated factors including variability in MRI hardware and technique, image quality, and population and patient‐specific factors such as prostate cancer disease prevalence. Iterative improvements in PI‐RADS have helped flatten the curve for novice readers and reduce variability. Innovations in image quality reporting, administrative and organisational workflows, and artificial intelligence hold promise in improving variability even further.ConclusionContinued research into PI‐RADS is needed to facilitate benchmark creation, reader certification, and independent accreditation, which are systems‐level interventions needed to uphold and maintain high‐quality prostate MRI across entire populations.