Clinical and longitudinal patterns of frequent presenters to emergency departments: A multi‐centre data linkage analysis

Author:

Stanford Dorota1,Dinh Michael M12,Eastwood John G34,Korczak Viola15ORCID,Seimon Radhika V2ORCID,Moore Corey6,Liu Hueiming7,Bein Kendall J12

Affiliation:

1. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. RPA Green Light Institute for Emergency Care Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Sydney Local Health District Sydney Australia

5. The George Institute for Global Health Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. Public Health Unit Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

7. Faculty of Medicine The University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo describe clinical characteristics and longitudinal patterns of representation in a cohort of patients who frequently present to EDs for care.MethodsA retrospective data analysis linking routinely collected ED data across three hospitals. The study population consisted of patients who presented to any ED on 10 or more occasions in any continuous 365‐day period from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2021. Presenting complaints were divided into those with any mental health, drug and alcohol, or social presentations (MHDAS group) and those without (non‐MHDAS group). Outcomes of interest were number of presentations as well as temporal and facility clustering of presentations. A per patient regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for increased presentations.ResultsPresentations by 1640 frequent ED presenters in the study constituted 4.6% of total ED presentations. MHDAS study group were younger, predominantly English speaking, twice as likely to be married, had lower hospital admission rates and almost three times as many of them did not wait for treatment. Statistically significant differences were also found between these groups regarding presentation clustering, facility entropy, each of the four categories of the number of ED presentations, and Index of Relative Socio‐Economic Advantage and Disadvantage.ConclusionRepresentations associated with MHDAS have a different trajectory of representation episodes compared to non‐MHDAS group. Escalating number of presentations and clustering are important predictors of future representation numbers. Those ‘did not waits’ who appear to be representing would be the highest risk of ongoing and persistent representations in the future and should be the target of early interventions to ensure they are accessing appropriate care before this happens.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3