Clinical research priorities in emergency medicine: Results of a consensus meeting and development of a weighting method for assessment of clinical research priorities-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical research priorities in emergency medicine: Results of a consensus meeting and development of a weighting method for assessment of clinical research priorities

Published:2014-02 Issue:1 Volume:26 Page:28-33
ISSN:1742-6731
Container-title:Emergency Medicine Australasia
language:en
Short-container-title:Emerg Med Australas

Author:

Thom Ogilvie¹²,Keijzers Gerben³⁴⁵,Davies Suzanne⁶⁷⁸,McD Taylor David⁹¹⁰,Knott Jonathan¹⁰¹¹,Middleton Paul M⁶⁷¹²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine; Nambour General Hospital; Sunshine Coast Queensland Australia

2. School of Medicine; University of Queensland; Sunshine Coast Queensland Australia

3. Department of Emergency Medicine; Gold Coast University Hospital; Gold Coast Queensland Australia

4. School of Medicine; Bond University; Gold Coast Queensland Australia

5. School of Medicine; Griffith University; Gold Coast Queensland Australia

6. Distributed Research in Emergency and Acute Medicine (DREAM) Collaboration; Sydney New South Wales Australia

7. Australian Resuscitation Council; NSW Branch; Australia

8. School of Medicine; University of Tasmania; Hobart Tasmania Australia

9. Emergency and General Medicine Research; Austin Health; Melbourne Victoria Australia

10. University of Melbourne; Parkville Victoria Australia

11. Department of Emergency Medicine; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia

12. Discipline of Emergency Medicine; University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. Clinical research priorities in emergency medicine;Keijzers;Emerg. Med. Australas.,2014

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Assessment protocol for excellence in public health http://www.cdc.gov/nphpsp/documents/Prioritization%20section%20from%20APEXPH%20in%20Practice.pdf

3. National Health and Medical Research Council NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/developers/nhmrc_levels_grades_evidence_120423.pdf

4. How is more negative evidence being used to support claims of benefit: the curious case of the third international stroke trial (IST-3);Hoffman;Emerg. Med. Australas.,2012

5. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection;Maitland;N. Engl. J. Med.,2011

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Approaches to prioritising research for clinical trial networks: a scoping review;Trials;2022-12-12

2. Research priority setting in emergency care: A scoping review;Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open;2022-12

3. Where are children seen in Australian emergency departments? Implications for research efforts;Emergency Medicine Australasia;2021-01-03

4. Identifying the priority challenges in trauma care delivery for Australian and New Zealand trauma clinicians;Injury;2020-09

5. Challenges to trauma care delivery for Australian and New Zealand trauma clinicians;Injury;2020-05