Evaluation of stable chest pain following emergency department presentation: Impact of first‐line cardiac computed tomography diagnostic strategy in an Australian setting

Author:

Lan Nick S.R.12ORCID,Thomas David‐Raj1,Jones Christopher L34,Raju Vikram5,Soon Jeanette5,Otto Jacobus5,Wood Chris5,Briffa Tom6,Dwivedi Girish12,Rankin James M1,Ihdayhid Abdul Rahman178

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia

2. Medical School Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

3. Department of Emergency Medicine Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia

4. School of Medicine The University of Notre Dame Australia Fremantle Western Australia Australia

5. Department of Radiology Fiona Stanley Hospital Perth Western Australia Australia

6. School of Population and Global Health The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

7. Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research Perth Western Australia Australia

8. Curtin Medical School, Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveInternational guidelines provide increasing support for computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in investigating chest pain. A pathway utilising CTCA first‐line for outpatient stable chest pain evaluation was implemented in an Australian ED.MethodsIn pre‐post design, the impact of the pathway was prospectively assessed over 6 months (August 2021 to January 2022) and compared with a 6‐month pre‐implementation group (February 2021 to July 2021). CTCA was recommended first‐line in suspected stable cardiac chest pain, followed by chest pain clinic review. Predefined criteria were provided recommending functional testing in select patients. The impact of CTCA versus functional testing was evaluated. Data were obtained from digital medical records.ResultsThree hundred and fifteen patients were included, 143 pre‐implementation and 172 post‐implementation. Characteristics were similar except age (pre‐implementation: 58.9 ± 12.0 vs post‐implementation: 62.8 ± 12.3 years, P = 0.004). Pathway‐guided management resulted in higher first‐line CTCA (73.3% vs 46.2%, P < 0.001), lower functional testing (30.2% vs 56.6%, P < 0.001) and lower proportion undergoing two non‐invasive tests (4.7% vs 10.5%, P = 0.047), without increasing investigation costs or invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (pre‐implementation: 13.3% vs post‐implementation: 9.3%, P = 0.263). In patients undergoing CTCA, 40.7% had normal coronaries and 36.2% minimal/mild disease, with no difference in disease burden post‐implementation. More medication changes occurred following CTCA compared with functional testing (aspirin: P = 0.005, statin: P < 0.001). In patients undergoing ICA, revascularisation to ICA ratio was higher following CTCA compared with functional testing (91.7% vs 18.2%, P < 0.001). No 30‐day myocardial infarction or death occurred.ConclusionsThe pathway increased CTCA utilisation and reduced downstream investigations. CTCA was associated with medication changes and improved ICA efficiency.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. A National Study of the Prevalence of Life-Threatening Diagnoses in Patients With Chest Pain

2. Diagnostic Strategies for the Evaluation of Chest Pain

3. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

4. AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Gulati M;Circulation,2021

5. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3