Fibrinogen levels in severe trauma: A preliminary comparison of Clauss Fibrinogen, ROTEM Sigma, ROTEM Delta and TEG 6s assays from the FEISTY pilot randomised clinical trial

Author:

Auty Travis1ORCID,McCullough James23,Hughes Ian245ORCID,Fanning Jonathon P567ORCID,Czuchwicki Sarah2ORCID,Winearls James2356ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Intensive Care Unit Rockhampton Hospital Rockhampton Queensland Australia

2. Intensive Care Unit Gold Coast University Hospital Gold Coast Queensland Australia

3. Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia

4. Office for Research Governance and Development Gold Coast University Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

6. Intensive Care Unit St Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, UnitingCare Health Brisbane Queensland Australia

7. Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo describe the relationships between different methods of measuring functional fibrinogen levels in severely injured, bleeding trauma patients across multiple timepoints during hospitalisation.MethodsIn 100 adult trauma patients enrolled in the FEISTY pilot randomised clinical trial at four tertiary trauma centres in Australia, blood samples were collected prospectively. Consistency of agreement was calculated, comparing functional fibrinogen levels measured by four methods – ROTEM® Delta and Sigma FIBTEM A5, TEG® 6s CFF MA, and gold‐standard Clauss Fibrinogen.ResultsComparing the ROTEM® Delta and new‐generation ROTEM® Sigma machine, consistency of agreement for FIBTEM A5, measured by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), was ≥0.73 across all analysed timepoints, with mean differences (Sigma minus Delta) of 0.10–3.57 mm. Corresponding values comparing the ROTEM® Sigma FIBTEM A5 and TEG® 6s CFF MA were ICC = 0.55–0.82 and ICC = 4.69–7.97 (CFF MA minus A5). Comparing ROTEM® Sigma FIBTEM A5 and Clauss Fibrinogen Analysis (CFA), among statistically significant simple linear regression models, R2 was 0.25–0.67, and comparing TEG® 6s CFF MA and CFA (CFA) 0.65–0.82, although not all differences were significant with the latter comparison. Relationships across all timepoints combined were Clauss Fibrinogen (CF) (g/L) = 0.21𝑥 + 0.004 (where 𝑥 = ROTEM® Sigma FIBTEM A5 in mm) and (g/L) = 0.16𝑥 − 0.06 (where 𝑥 = TEG® 6s CFF MA in mm).ConclusionsThe present study revealed acceptable agreement between four different assays measuring functional fibrinogen, with current‐ and previous‐generation ROTEM® machines (Sigma, Delta) performing similarly measuring functional fibrinogen via FIBTEM assay. This suggests that haemostatic resuscitation algorithms designed for the ROTEM® Delta can be applied to the ROTEM® Sigma to guide fibrinogen replacement.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3