What can coronial cases tell us about the quality of emergency healthcare for prisoners in Australia?

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis research aimed to examine the legal and regulatory obligations of authorities and healthcare professionals in the provision of prison emergency health services and to identify problems in the provision of emergency care to prisoners by using case examples from coronial findings.MethodsReview of legal and regulatory obligations and a search of coronial cases for deaths related to the provision of emergency healthcare in prisons in the past 10 years in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland.ResultsThe case review identified several themes – issues with prison authority policies and procedures that delay access to timely healthcare or compromise the quality of care, operational and logistical factors, clinical issues and stigmatic issues including prison staff attitudes to prisoners requesting urgent healthcare assistance.ConclusionCoronial findings and royal commissions have repeatedly identified deficiencies in the emergency healthcare provided to prisoners in Australia. These deficiencies are operational, clinical and stigmatic and not limited to a single prison or jurisdiction. Applying a health quality of care framework focussed on prevention and chronic health management, appropriate assessment and escalation when urgent medical assistance is requested, and a structured audit framework could avoid future preventable deaths in prisons.