Derivation of a clinical decision rule to exclude cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in emergency department patients: A retrospective cohort study

Author:

Asha Stephen Edward12ORCID,Prageshan Janani1,Seidman Zachariah1

Affiliation:

1. Emergency Department St George Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. St George and Sutherland Clinical School The University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo derive a clinical decision rule to exclude cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) in the ED. A secondary aim was to derive a rule that incorporated clinical parameters and the non‐contrast CT brain.MethodsSingle‐centre, retrospective cohort study. Patients suspected of CVST were identified from the radiology database for CT/MR venograms. Clinical features included in the rule were determined by literature review. The presence of these features in participants was determined by chart review. Variables were tested for univariate association with CVST using logistic regression. Variable selection was accomplished using a forward‐stepwise process, calculating the sensitivity/specificity of a rule containing the variable of most significance, then repeating the process after adding the next most significant variable.ResultsForty‐five out of 912 participants had confirmed CVST. The primary clinical rule was answering ‘no’ to all the following: any prothrombotic risk factor, age ≥54 years, confusion: sensitivity 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.9–99.5%), specificity 40.9% (95% CI 37.6–44.2%), negative predictive value 99.4% (95% CI 97.9–99.9%) and positive predictive value 7.7% (95% CI 7.1–8.3%). The rule classified 39.5% of participants as CVST ruled out. The rule incorporating the non‐contrast CT brain was answering ‘no’ to all the following: abnormal non‐contrast CT brain, any prothrombotic risk‐factor, age ≥54 years, confusion: sensitivity 100.0% (95% CI 91.6–100.0%), specificity 42.0% (95% CI 38.7–45.4%), negative predictive value 100.0% (95% CI not calculated) and positive predictive value 7.8% (95% CI 7.4–8.2%). The rule classified 40.0% of participants as CVST ruled out.ConclusionsA clinical decision rule was derived to rule out CVST. These results require validation before adoption into clinical practice.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3