External validation of a pharmacokinetic model for target‐controlled infusion of cefazolin as a prophylactic antibiotic

Author:

Lee Sou Hyun1,Yoon Hyeongseo2,Park Junik3,Choi Jae Moon3,Kim Kyung Mi3,Lee Eun‐Kyung4,Noh Gyu‐Jeong5,Moon Ju‐Yeon6,Cho Byung‐Moon3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center Keimyung University School of Medicine Daegu South Korea

2. University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul South Korea

3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul South Korea

4. Department of Statistics Ewha Womans University Seoul South Korea

5. Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul South Korea

6. Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis International Scientific Standards, Inc Chucheon‐si South Korea

Abstract

AimsThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of previously constructed cefazolin pharmacokinetic models and determine whether cefazolin administration via the target‐controlled infusion (TCI) method may be possible in clinical practice.MethodsTwenty‐five gastrectomy patients receiving cefazolin as a prophylactic antibiotic were enrolled. Two grams of cefazolin was dissolved in 50 mL of normal saline to give a concentration of 40 mg mL−1. Before skin incision, cefazolin was administered using a TCI syringe pump, and its administration continued until the end of surgery. The target total plasma concentration was set to 100 μg mL−1. Total and unbound plasma concentrations of cefazolin were measured in three arterial blood samples collected at 30, 60 and 120 min after the start of cefazolin administration. The predictive performance of the TCI system was evaluated using four measures: inaccuracy, divergence, bias and wobble.ResultsTotal (n = 75) and unbound (n = 75) plasma concentration measurements from 25 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled median (95% confidence interval) biases and inaccuracies were 6.3 (4.0‐8.5) and 10.5 (8.6‐12.4) for the total concentration model and −10.3 (−16.8 to −3.7) and 22.4 (18.2‐26.7) for the unbound concentration model, respectively. All unbound concentrations were above 10 μg mL−1.ConclusionAdministration of cefazolin by the TCI method showed a clinically acceptable performance. Applying the TCI method by setting the total concentration as the target concentration rather than the unbound concentration is effective in maintaining a constant target concentration of cefazolin.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3