Identifying predictors of translocation success in rare plant species

Author:

Bellis Joe12ORCID,Osazuwa‐Peters Oyomoare3,Maschinski Joyce24,Keir Matthew J.5,Parsons Elliott W.6,Kaye Thomas N.78,Kunz Michael9,Possley Jennifer4,Menges Eric10,Smith Stacy A.1011,Roth Daniela12,Brewer Debbie13,Brumback William14,Lange James J.4,Niederer Christal15,Turner‐Skoff Jessica B.16,Bontrager Megan17,Braham Richard18,Coppoletta Michelle19,Holl Karen D.20,Williamson Paula21,Bell Timothy16,Jonas Jayne L.22,McEachern Kathryn23,Robertson Kathy L.24,Birnbaum Sandra J.25,Dattilo Adam26,Dollard John J.27,Fant Jeremie28,Kishida Wendy5,Lesica Peter29,Link Steven O.30,Pavlovic Noel B.31,Poole Jackie25,Reemts Charlotte M.32,Stiling Peter33,Taylor David D.34,Titus Jonathan H.35,Titus Priscilla J.36,Adkins Edith D.37,Chambers Timothy38,Paschke Mark W.39,Heineman Katherine D.2,Albrecht Matthew A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis Missouri USA

2. Center for Plant Conservation Escondido California USA

3. Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

4. Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Coral Gables Florida USA

5. Department of Land and Natural Resources Hawaiʻi Division of Forestry and Wildlife Honolulu Hawaii USA

6. Pacific Regional Invasive Species and Climate Change Management Network University of Hawaii at Mānoa Honolulu Hawaii USA

7. Institute for Applied Ecology Corvallis Oregon USA

8. Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA

9. North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

10. Archbold Biological Station Venus Florida USA

11. Agronomy Department University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

12. New Mexico Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department Forestry Division Santa Fe New Mexico USA

13. Fort Huachuca Environmental and Natural Resources Division Fort Huachuca Arizona USA

14. Native Plant Trust Framingham Massachusetts USA

15. Creekside Science Los Gatos California USA

16. The Morton Arboretum Lisle Illinois USA

17. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada

18. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

19. USDA Forest Service Quincy California USA

20. Environmental Studies Department University of California Santa Cruz Santa Cruz California USA

21. Department of Biology Texas State University San Marcos Texas USA

22. Department of Biology University of Nebraska at Kearney Kearney Nebraska USA

23. U.S. Geological Survey WERC‐Channel Islands Field Station Ventura California USA

24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Phoenix Arizona USA

25. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Austin Texas USA

26. Tennessee Valley Authority Knoxville Tennessee USA

27. Croatan National Forest Forest Service New Bern North Carolina USA

28. Chicago Botanic Garden Glencoe Illinois USA

29. Division of Biological Sciences University of Montana Missoula Montana USA

30. Department of Natural Resources Energy and Environmental Sciences Program Pendleton Oregon USA

31. U.S. Geological Survey GLSC ‐ Lake Michigan Ecological Research Station Chesterton Indiana USA

32. The Nature Conservancy San Antonio Texas USA

33. Department of Integrative Biology University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA

34. Daniel Boone National Forest USDA Forest Service Winchester Kentucky USA

35. Biology Department, Science Center State University of New York Fredonia New York USA

36. Freelance Ecologist Fredonia New York USA

37. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Honolulu Hawaii USA

38. U.S Army Natural Resources Program on Oahu Schofield Barracks Hawaii USA

39. Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractThe fundamental goal of a rare plant translocation is to create self‐sustaining populations with the evolutionary resilience to persist in the long term. Yet, most plant translocation syntheses focus on a few factors influencing short‐term benchmarks of success (e.g., survival and reproduction). Short‐term benchmarks can be misleading when trying to infer future growth and viability because the factors that promote establishment may differ from those required for long‐term persistence. We assembled a large (n = 275) and broadly representative data set of well‐documented and monitored (7.9 years on average) at‐risk plant translocations to identify the most important site attributes, management techniques, and species’ traits for six life‐cycle benchmarks and population metrics of translocation success. We used the random forest algorithm to quantify the relative importance of 29 predictor variables for each metric of success. Drivers of translocation outcomes varied across time frames and success metrics. Management techniques had the greatest relative influence on the attainment of life‐cycle benchmarks and short‐term population trends, whereas site attributes and species’ traits were more important for population persistence and long‐term trends. Specifically, large founder sizes increased the potential for reproduction and recruitment into the next generation, whereas declining habitat quality and the outplanting of species with low seed production led to increased extinction risks and a reduction in potential reproductive output in the long‐term, respectively. We also detected novel interactions between some of the most important drivers, such as an increased probability of next‐generation recruitment in species with greater seed production rates, but only when coupled with large founder sizes. Because most significant barriers to plant translocation success can be overcome by improving techniques or resolving site‐level issues through early intervention and management, we suggest that by combining long‐term monitoring with adaptive management, translocation programs can enhance the prospects of achieving long‐term success.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3