The case against neuroplastic analysis: A further illustration of the irrelevance of neuroscience to psychoanalysis through a critique of Doidge's The Brain that Changes Itself-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The case against neuroplastic analysis: A further illustration of the irrelevance of neuroscience to psychoanalysis through a critique of Doidge's The Brain that Changes Itself

Published:2013-04 Issue:2 Volume:94 Page:391-410
ISSN:0020-7578
Container-title:The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
language:en
Short-container-title:The International Journal of Psychoanalysis

Author:

Carmeli Zvi¹,Blass Rachel²

Affiliation:

1. The Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, 91905

2. Heythrop College, The University of London, 23 Kensington Square, London, W8 5HN, UK

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-8315.12022

Reference19 articles.

1. The case against neuropsychoanalysis: On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse

2. A Randomized Field Trial of the Fast ForWord Language Computer-Based Training Program

3. The Trouble with Neurobiological Explanations of Mind

4. Braintrust

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The discursive construction of self-diagnosed “pornography addiction”;The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality;2024-04-01

2. Examining the function of neurobiology in Christian spiritual experiences and practice;HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies;2020-11-24

3. Psychobiology and Psychoanalysis;Psychobiology of Behaviour;2019

4. On the need of fundaments in psychoanalytic thinking;The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review;2017-07-03

5. Response to Kessler, Sandberg, and Busch: The case for and against neuropsychoanalysis;The International Journal of Psychoanalysis;2016-08