Deceptive learning in histopathology

Abstract

AimsDeep learning holds immense potential for histopathology, automating tasks that are simple for expert pathologists and revealing novel biology for tasks that were previously considered difficult or impossible to solve by eye alone. However, the extent to which the visual strategies learned by deep learning models in histopathological analysis are trustworthy or not has yet to be systematically analysed. Here, we systematically evaluate deep neural networks (DNNs) trained for histopathological analysis in order to understand if their learned strategies are trustworthy or deceptive.Methods and resultsWe trained a variety of DNNs on a novel data set of 221 whole‐slide images (WSIs) from lung adenocarcinoma patients, and evaluated their effectiveness at (1) molecular profiling of KRAS versus EGFR mutations, (2) determining the primary tissue of a tumour and (3) tumour detection. While DNNs achieved above‐chance performance on molecular profiling, they did so by exploiting correlations between histological subtypes and mutations, and failed to generalise to a challenging test set obtained through laser capture microdissection (LCM). In contrast, DNNs learned robust and trustworthy strategies for determining the primary tissue of a tumour as well as detecting and localising tumours in tissue.ConclusionsOur work demonstrates that DNNs hold immense promise for aiding pathologists in analysing tissue. However, they are also capable of achieving seemingly strong performance by learning deceptive strategies that leverage spurious correlations, and are ultimately unsuitable for research or clinical work. The framework we propose for model evaluation and interpretation is an important step towards developing reliable automated systems for histopathological analysis.