Joint status, pain and quality of life in elderly people with haemophilia: A case‐control study

Author:

Chantrain Valérie‐Anne1234ORCID,Foubert Anthe123ORCID,Meeus Mira12ORCID,Lambert Catherine3ORCID,Lobet Sébastien345ORCID,Maes Philip6ORCID,Fransen Erik7ORCID,Durnez Lies1ORCID,Hermans Cedric3ORCID,Roussel Nathalie Anne1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicines and Health Sciences Research Group (MOVANT) Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI) University of Antwerp Wilrijk Belgium

2. Pain in Motion International Research Group Brussel Belgium

3. Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit Division of Haematology Cliniques universitaires Saint‐Luc Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) Brussels Belgium

4. Neuromusculoskeletal Lab (NMSK) Secteur des Sciences de la Santé Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) Brussels Belgium

5. Secteur de Kinésithérapie Cliniques universitaires Saint‐Luc Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) Brussels Belgium

6. Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit Division of Paediatric Haematology University Hospital Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

7. Centre of Medical Genetics University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital Edegem Belgium

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionElderly people with haemophilia (PwH) develop haemophilic arthropathy, pain, and reduced health‐related quality of life (HR‐QoL). The condition of elderly mild haemophilia patients have rarely been evaluated. This study aimed to compare joint status, pain, and HR‐QoL between elderly with mild, moderate/severe haemophilia and healthy elderlies.MethodsKnee/ankle abnormalities were assessed by ultrasound (HEAD‐US) and physical examination (HJHS 2.1). Pain severity and pain interference were investigated using the Brief Pain Inventory. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were obtained at knees/ankles and forehead. Functional limitations were evaluated using the 2‐Minute‐Walking‐Test, Timed‐Up‐and‐Go and HAL. The EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire evaluated HR‐QoL. Healthy controls (HCs) and elderly individuals with moderate/severe and mild haemophilia were compared using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests.ResultsFrom the 46 elderly PwH approached, 40 individuals (≥60 years) with haemophilia A/B (17 moderate/severe; 23 mild) and 20 age‐matched HCs were recruited. Moderate/severe PwH displayed worse joint status, lower PPTs, and poorer HR‐QoL than mild PwH and HCs (p‐value = .010–<.001). HEAD‐US abnormalities were observed in 100% of knees and 94% of ankles in moderate/severe PwH, versus 50% of knees and 61% of ankles in mild PwH. Pain was reported by 80% and 57% of moderate/severe and mild PwH, respectively. Low PPTs, functional limitations, and poor HR‐QoL scores were likewise observed in some mild PwH, yet without significantly differing from HCs.ConclusionThis study highlights poor joint/functional status, pain, and HR‐QoL outcomes in elderly with moderate/severe haemophilia. A few mild haemophilia subjects presented joint abnormalities, pain, functional limitations, and poor HR‐QoL, without significantly differing from HCs.Highlights Elderly individuals with mild haemophilia have not yet been extensively studied, whereas moderate/severe haemophilia individuals have proven to suffer from haemophilic arthropathy, pain, and poor health‐related quality of life (HR‐QoL). Using a case‐control design, joint status, pain, and HR‐QoL outcomes were examined in elderly haemophilia individuals and compared with those of healthy controls (HCs). Elderly moderate/severe haemophilia individuals exhibited worse joint status, increased joint pain sensitivity, and reduced HR‐QoL compared with both mild haemophilia subjects and HCs. A subset of mild haemophilia subjects exhibited poor joint status, pain, and HR‐QoL outcomes, without any differences noted when compared with HCs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Hematology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3