Patient and caregiver preferences for haemophilia treatments: A discrete‐choice experiment

Author:

Garcia Viridiana Cano1,Mansfield Carol2,Pierce Anna2,Leach Colton2,Smith Jane Cavanaugh1,Afonso Marion3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Global Medical Affairs Sanofi Cambridge Massachusetts USA

2. Health Preference Assessment RTI Health Solutions Research Triangle Park North Carolina USA

3. Health Economics and Value Assessment Sanofi Chilly‐Mazarin France

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAn evolving haemophilia treatment landscape provides new possibilities for previously unattainable lifestyles.AimWe sought to understand how people with haemophilia (PwH) and their caregivers value the potential benefits of novel prophylactic treatments. We conducted a discrete‐choice experiment (DCE) to quantify preferences for features of haemophilia treatments among adults and caregivers of children with haemophilia. A best‐worst scaling (BWS) exercise measured the perceived burden of treatment administration features.MethodsA cross‐sectional, web‐based survey was administered to male adults (≥18 years) and caregivers of male children (≤17 years) living with haemophilia in the United States. Respondents evaluated eight pairs of hypothetical haemophilia treatment profiles defined by six attributes in the DCE and 15 features in the BWS.ResultsIn the DCE, both adults with haemophilia (n = 151) and caregivers (n = 151) prioritised avoiding the risk of developing inhibitor/ anti‐drug antibodies and treatments that allowed for a more active life. They placed a lower priority on reducing the number of spontaneous bleeding episodes, route and frequency of administration, and avoiding the risk of hospitalisation due to adverse events. The BWS documented the burdensomeness of IV infusions and medications that require mixing and refrigeration.ConclusionPwH and caregivers prefer treatments that enable a more active lifestyle with a lower risk of inhibitor development. Both groups valued the ability to lead an active life over reducing spontaneous bleeding, with caregivers placing the most weight on this attribute. As new treatments expand possibilities, healthcare professionals and PwH should continue to share decision‐making, incorporating clinical judgment and individual preferences.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference20 articles.

1. Current challenges in the management of hemophilia;Bauer KA;Am J Manag Care,2015

2. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition

3. Achieving the unimaginable: Health equity in haemophilia

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3