The Danish child and parent Gait Outcomes Assessment List questionnaires were reliable and valid for cerebral palsy

Abstract

AbstractAimWe investigated the reliability and validity of the Danish child and parent versions of the Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) questionnaires for ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP).MethodsTranslation and cultural adaptations were performed and content validity evaluated. Participants were enrolled between 2016 and 2018 from Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Children and parents completed the GOAL questionnaires twice for test–retest reliability. Discriminative validity was evaluated by comparing the child and parent GOAL scores between children with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I and II. The concurrent validity of the GOAL questionnaires were investigated by comparing them with Challenge‐20, which assesses motor skills in children with CP.ResultsWe studied 59 children (57% boys) with CP and GMFCS I‐II at a mean age of 10.6 years. Test–retest intra‐class correlations were excellent for the children (0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.96) and good for the parents (0.83, 95% CI 0.67–0.91). GOAL scores decreased with increasing GMFCS (p < 0.05). Both versions correlated well. The mean children's scores were significantly (6.2/100) higher than the parents' (p < 0.001). The GOAL scores correlated positively with Challenge‐20.ConclusionThe Danish GOAL child and parent questionnaires demonstrated good reliability and content and discriminative and concurrent validity.