Focal impulse and rotor modulation guided ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: A meta‐analysis of head‐to‐head comparative studies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Focal impulse and rotor modulation guided ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: A meta‐analysis of head‐to‐head comparative studies

Published:2021-05-27 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1045-3873
Container-title:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol

Author:

Romero Jorge¹^ORCID,Gabr Mohamed¹^ORCID,Alviz Isabella¹^ORCID,Briceno David¹^ORCID,Diaz Juan Carlos¹^ORCID,Rodriguez Daniel¹^ORCID,Patel Kavisha¹^ORCID,Polanco Dalvert¹^ORCID,Trivedi Chintan²,Mohanty Sanghamitra²^ORCID,Della Rocca Domenico²,Lakkireddy Dhanunjaya³,Natale Andrea²^ORCID,Di Biase Luigi¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Montefiore‐Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA

2. St. David's Medical Center Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute Austin Texas USA

3. HCA Midwest Health Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Kansas City Missouri USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jce.15036

Reference20 articles.

1. Ablation of rotor and focal sources reduces late recurrence of atrial fibrillation compared with trigger ablation alone: extended follow‐up of the CONFIRM trial (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation);Narayan SM;J Am Coll Cardiol,2014

2. Long‐term outcome of pulmonary vein isolation with and without focal impulse and rotor modulation mapping: insights from a meta‐analysis;Mohanty S;Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2018

3. Efficacy and safety of driver‐guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis;Ramirez FD;J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2017