How well do nurses know their patients? Agreement between patients' degree‐of‐worry and nurses' estimation of patients' degree‐of‐worry—An observational study

Author:

Gamst‐Jensen Hejdi123,Trondarson Tordis1,Kallemose Thomas1ORCID,Poulsen Ingrid1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Research Centre Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager Hvidovre Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Emergency Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager Hvidovre Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Anesthesia Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAimTo assess the agreement between patients' self‐reported degree‐of‐worry (DOW) and nurses' evaluation of patients' DOW.DesignAn observational cohort study with patients and their primary nurses.MethodsBetween 22 February and 27 March 2021, data collection among patients and their nurses in an emergency department was carried out. Patients ≥18 years, cognitively intact and Danish or English speaking were eligible to participate. Nurses regardless of seniority and gender were eligible for participation. The single‐item degree‐of‐worry measure, ‘how worried are you about the condition you are here today on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimally worried and 10 is maximum worried’ as well as information on gender, age, co‐morbidity, triage level and medical reason for encounter was collected from patients. The corresponding nurses were asked; ‘how worried do you think your patient is about the condition he/she is there today on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimally worried and 10 is maximum worried?’ Nurses also supplied data on gender, age, seniority as a Registered Nurse and in the ED. Agreement between patients' self‐reported degree‐of‐worry and nurses' evaluation of patients' degree‐of‐worry was assessed with weighted Cohen's Kappa.ResultsA total of 194 patient–nurse pairs were included for analysis. The agreement between patients' DOW and nurses' evaluation of patients' DOW categorised as DOWlow, DOWmiddle and DOWhigh was in total agreement in n = 85 pairs (43.8%) of the ratings, which corresponds to a weighted Cohen's Kappa of 0.19 (0.08–0.30; p < 0.001).ConclusionNurses estimate of their patients' DOW was in very poor agreement. This indicates that nurses are not able to assess the patient's DOW to a satisfactory level. This result is troubling as it may have serious consequences for patient care as it indicates that the nurses do not know their patients' perspectives.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3