A Danish version of the MISSCARE survey: Translation and validation

Author:

Lisby Marianne12ORCID,Tei Randi3ORCID,Mainz Hanne14,Gregersen Merete5,Andersen Karen Vestergaard2

Affiliation:

1. Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

2. The Emergency Department Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

3. The Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

4. The Department of Orthopedic Surgery Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

5. The Department of Geriatrics Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMeasuring missed nursing care in clinical settings may serve as an important indicator for improving patient safety and nursing staff retention. Internationally, several tools exist, with the MISSCARE Survey being the most frequently used and validated; however, no tools are available in the Danish language.AimThis study aimed at translating the MISSCARE Survey from US English to Danish and evaluate its psychometric properties.MethodsThe translation followed the recommended method, that is forward‐and‐backward translation, involving clinical experts and a professional, native English‐speaking translator. The final version was approved by the survey's original developer. Face validity was tested among 10 nurses and 1 practical nurse. Nursing staff from 34 selected departments at Aarhus University Hospital's (n = 1241) were invited to participate in a pilot test in November 2020. The survey consisted of a demographic section, a section of ‘nursing elements’ (Part A) and section of ‘reasons’ (Part B). Acceptability was assessed on Part A and B. Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha, and psychometric properties were investigated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Part B).ResultsThe face‐validity test resulted in minor contextual changes and the addition of a ‘not applicable’ response option in Part A. The pilot test had a 42.6% response rate (n = 529). Acceptability was good, with 1–10 missing responses per item in Part A and 0–20 missing responses in Part B. The numbers of ‘not applicable’ responses ranged from 0 to 81. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.81. Factor‐loading ranges were 0.62–0.48 for ‘communication’, 0.79–0.39 for ‘materials and resources’, and 0.50–0.35 for ‘labour’, suggesting an acceptable fit with the theoretical model.ConclusionThe MISSCARE Survey was successfully translated into Danish. The psychometric properties confirmed the questionnaire as a valid and reliable tool for measuring missed nursing care in Danish hospital settings.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3