Understanding barriers to reducing antimicrobials on Australian dairy farms: A qualitative analysis

Author:

Langhorne C1,Wood BJ1,Wood C1,Henning J1ORCID,McGowan M1,Schull D1,Ranjbar S1ORCID,Gibson JS1

Affiliation:

1. School of Veterinary Science The University of Queensland Gatton Queensland 4343 Australia

Abstract

IntroductionReducing antibiotic use in production animal systems is one strategy which may help to limit the development of antimicrobial resistance. To reduce antimicrobial use in food‐producing animals, it is important to first understand how antibiotics are used on farm and what barriers exist to decreasing their use. In dairy production systems, mastitis is one of the most common reasons for administering antimicrobials. Therefore, it is important to understand the motivations and behaviours of dairy farmers in relation to the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of mastitis.Materials and methodsIn this study, we interviewed a sample of dairy farmers and dairy industry professionals from the major dairying regions of eastern Australia regarding their current practices used to diagnose, treat, and control subclinical and clinical mastitis. Inductive thematic analysis was used to code interview transcripts and identify the recurrent themes.ResultsFour overarching themes were identified: (1) the challenges associated with the detection and diagnosis of clinical mastitis, including with laboratory culture, (2) the motivations behind treatment decisions for different cases, (3) decisions around dry cow therapy and the role of herd recording, and (4) concerns regarding the development of antimicrobial resistance.DiscussionThis study identifies several challenges which may limit the ability of Australian dairy farmers to reduce antimicrobial use on farm, such as the need for rapid and reliable diagnostic tests capable of identifying the pathogenic causes of mastitis and the difficulties associated with conducting herd recording for the implementation of selective dry cow therapy. Industry professionals were concerned that farmers were not using individual cow records to aid in treatment decisions, which could result in unnecessary antimicrobial use. The results of this study can act as the basis for future research aimed at assessing these issues across the broader Australian dairy industry.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference32 articles.

1. Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry.Dairy in Australia.2022. Available at:https://www.agriculture.gov.au/agriculture-land/farm-food-drought/meat-wool-dairy/dairy. Accessed 15 August 2022.

2. Dairy Australia.Australian dairy industry in focus.2021. Available at:https://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/ja‐jp/industry‐statistics/industry‐reports/australian‐dairy‐industry‐in‐focus#.Y0x00XZByUk. Accessed 17 August 2022.

3. A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention

4. Antimicrobial Resistance of Mastitis Pathogens

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3