The cost of potentially inappropriate medications for older adults in Canada: A comparative cross‐sectional study

Author:

Huon Jean‐François123ORCID,Sanyal Chiranjeev4,Gagnon Camille L.1ORCID,Turner Justin P.15ORCID,Khuong Ninh B.1ORCID,Bortolussi‐Courval Émilie3ORCID,Lee Todd C.36ORCID,Silvius James L.178,Morgan Steven G.9,McDonald Emily G.1310ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada

2. Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacie Nantes France

3. Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada

4. College of Pharmacy Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

5. Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center for Medicine Use and Safety Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada

7. Alberta Health Services Edmonton Alberta Canada

8. Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

9. School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

10. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine McGill University Health Centre Montréal Québec Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPotentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are medications whereby the harms may outweigh the benefits for a given individual. Although overprescribed to older adults, their direct costs on the healthcare system are poorly described.MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional study of the cost of PIMs for Canadians aged 65 and older, using adapted criteria from the American Geriatrics Society. We examined prescription claims information from the National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System in 2021 and compared these with 2013. The overall levels of inflation‐adjusted total annual expenditure on PIMs, average cost per quarterly exposure, and average quarterly exposures to PIMs were calculated in CAD$.ResultsExposure to most categories of PIMs decreased, aside from gabapentinoids, proton pump inhibitors, and antipsychotics, all of which increased. Canadians spent $1 billion on PIMs in 2021, a 33.6% reduction compared with 2013 ($1.5 billion). In 2021, the largest annual expenditures were on proton pump inhibitors ($211 million) and gabapentinoids ($126 million). The quarterly amount spent on PIMs per person exposed decreased from $95 to $57. In terms of mean cost per person, opioids and antipsychotics were highest ($138 and $118 per exposure). Some cost savings may have occurred secondary to an observed decline of 16.4% in the quarterly rate of exposure to PIMs (from 7301 per 10,000 in 2013 to 6106 per 10,000 in 2021).ConclusionsWhile expenditures on PIMs have declined in Canada, the overall cost remains high. Prescribing of some seriously harmful classes of PIMs has increased and so directed, scalable interventions are needed.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3