Current management of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients: Experience derived from an ESGICH–ESOT survey

Author:

Visentin Alessandro1ORCID,Pickavance Elise2,San‐Juan Rafael345ORCID,Grossi Paolo Antonio6ORCID,Manuel Oriol2ORCID,Aguado Jose M.345ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Diseases Department of Diagnostics and Public Health University of Verona Verona Italy

2. Infectious Diseases Service and Transplantation Centre Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

3. Unit of Infectious Diseases Hospital Universitario “12 de Octubre” Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital “12 de Octubre” (imas12) Madrid Spain

4. CIBERINFEC Instituto de Salud Carlos III Madrid Spain

5. Department of Medicine School of Medicine Universidad Complutense Madrid Spain

6. Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Insubria‐ASST‐Sette Laghi Varese Italy

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveSolid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a poorer SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine response and higher risk for COVID‐19‐associated complications. However, there is no consensus on the current management of COVID‐19 and data on persistent COVID‐19 rates in SOT recipients are lacking.MethodsAn electronic survey concerning the management of COVID‐19 in SOT recipients was distributed among all members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) and of the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). Four major sections were covered: prevention, early COVID‐19, late COVID‐19, and persistent COVID‐19. We developed a structured questionnaire including eight multiple‐choice questions with branching logic in case of positive answers and three open‐ended questions related to clinical practice. Questions were asked separately for lung and non‐lung transplantation.ResultsThirty‐two physicians from 24 different centers participated. Most answers (n = 30) were provided by European physicians. Thirty of 32 (93.75%) physicians managed non‐lung transplant recipients and 12 of 32 (33.3%) lung transplant recipients. There was a huge variability in practice regarding the treatment of COVID‐19, and particularly noticeable when considering lung and non‐lung transplant recipients. Main discordances included the use of nirmatrelvir alone or in combination therapy for early COVID‐19, the use of immunomodulatory drugs other than steroids for late COVID‐19, and the need for treating asymptomatic viral shedding in persistent COVID‐19. There was more similarity in terms of prophylaxis recommendations.ConclusionDespite a low number of respondents, this survey shows that there are many differences on how experts manage SARS‐CoV‐2 infections in SOT recipients. image

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3