Further psychometric validation and test–retest reproducibility of the WOUND‐Q

Abstract

AbstractWOUND‐Q is a condition‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure developed for all types of chronic wounds, located anywhere on the body. To establish reliability and validity of a patient‐reported outcome measure, multiple pieces of evidence are required. The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement properties of 9 of the 13 WOUND‐Q scales and perform a test–retest reproducibility study in an international sample. In August 2022, we invited members of an international online community (Prolific.com) with any type of chronic wound to complete a survey containing the WOUND‐Q scales, the Wound‐QoL and EQ‐5D. A test–retest survey was performed 7 days after the first survey. It was possible to examine the reliability and validity of eight of the nine WOUND‐Q scales by Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT). To examine test–retest reproducibility intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), the standard error of the measurement and the smallest detectable change were calculated. In total, 421 patients from 22 different countries with 11 different types of chronic wounds took part in this study. Our analyses provided further evidence of the reliability and validity of the scales measuring wound characteristics (assessment, drainage, smell), health‐related quality of life (life impact, psychological, sleep, social) and wound treatment (dressing).