Convergence in simulating global soil organic carbon by structurally different models after data assimilation

Author:

Tao Feng12ORCID,Houlton Benjamin Z.13ORCID,Huang Yuanyuan4ORCID,Wang Ying‐Ping5ORCID,Manzoni Stefano6ORCID,Ahrens Bernhard7ORCID,Mishra Umakant89ORCID,Jiang Lifen10ORCID,Huang Xiaomeng2ORCID,Luo Yiqi10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

2. Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Institute for Global Change Studies Tsinghua University Beijing China

3. Department of Global Development Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

4. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

5. CSIRO Environment Clayton South Victoria Australia

6. Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden

7. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena Germany

8. Computational Biology and Biophysics Sandia National Laboratories Livermore California USA

9. Joint BioEnergy Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Emeryville California USA

10. Soil and Crop Sciences Section, School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

Abstract

AbstractCurrent biogeochemical models produce carbon–climate feedback projections with large uncertainties, often attributed to their structural differences when simulating soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics worldwide. However, choices of model parameter values that quantify the strength and represent properties of different soil carbon cycle processes could also contribute to model simulation uncertainties. Here, we demonstrate the critical role of using common observational data in reducing model uncertainty in estimates of global SOC storage. Two structurally different models featuring distinctive carbon pools, decomposition kinetics, and carbon transfer pathways simulate opposite global SOC distributions with their customary parameter values yet converge to similar results after being informed by the same global SOC database using a data assimilation approach. The converged spatial SOC simulations result from similar simulations in key model components such as carbon transfer efficiency, baseline decomposition rate, and environmental effects on carbon fluxes by these two models after data assimilation. Moreover, data assimilation results suggest equally effective simulations of SOC using models following either first‐order or Michaelis–Menten kinetics at the global scale. Nevertheless, a wider range of data with high‐quality control and assurance are needed to further constrain SOC dynamics simulations and reduce unconstrained parameters. New sets of data, such as microbial genomics‐function relationships, may also suggest novel structures to account for in future model development. Overall, our results highlight the importance of observational data in informing model development and constraining model predictions.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

National Key Research and Development Program of China

Sandia National Laboratories

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3