Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopaedics, Fukui General Hospital, Fukui, Japan
Abstract
Background A modification to the traditional horizontal mattress suture technique was developed for double-loaded anchors and named the cross-mattress suture. The sutures are placed similar to a traditional horizontal mattress suture; however, the limbs from the same pair of sutures are placed alternately. The present study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of the cross-mattress suture with the simple and traditional horizontal mattress suture. Methods Eighteen fresh porcine infraspinatus tendons were divided into three different repair groups (the simple, the mattress or the cross-mattress group) and were fixed using a suture anchor loaded with two high-tension sutures. Maximum failure load was recorded. Results The cross-mattress suture showed a significantly greater maximum load to failure. The average maximum load to failure was 23.0 N for the simple stitch, 35.1 N for the mattress and 67.7 N for the cross-mattress group. The maximum load to failure for the cross-mattress was greater than the simple (p < 0.05) and the mattress (p < 0.05). Discussion The results obtained in the present study indicate that the cross-mattress suture supports the greatest maximum failure load, and suggests that it is biomechanically superior to the traditional mattress or the simple suture configuration. It is easy, compact and reproducible.
Subject
Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献