Affiliation:
1. Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan
2. Department of Neuropsychiatry Kindai University Faculty of Medicine Osakasayama Japan
3. Department of Psychiatry Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima Japan
4. Faculty of Social Welfare Kumamoto Gakuen University Kumamoto Japan
5. Department of Psychiatry Arao Kokoronosato Hospital Arao Japan
6. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Life Sciences Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan
7. Department of Psychiatry Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundGesture imitation, a simple tool for assessing visuospatial/visuoconstructive functions, is reportedly useful for screening and diagnosing dementia. However, gesture imitation performance in healthy older adults is largely unknown, as are the factors associated with lower performance. To address these unknowns, we examined the gesture imitation performance of a large number of community‐dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years in Arao City, Kumamoto Prefecture (southern Japan).MethodsThe examiner presented the participants with eight gesture patterns and considered it a success if they could imitate them within 10 s. The success rate of each gesture imitation was calculated for three diagnostic groups: cognitively normal (CN) (n = 1184), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 237), and dementia (n = 47). Next, we reorganised the original gesture imitation battery by combining six selected gestures with the following scoring method: if the participants successfully imitated the gestures, immediately or within 5 s, two points were assigned. If they succeeded within 5–10 s, one point was assigned. The sensitivity and specificity of the battery were investigated to detect the dementia and MCI groups. Factors associated with gesture imitation battery scores were examined.ResultsExcept one complex gesture, the success rate of imitation in the CN group was high, approximately 90%. The sensitivity and specificity of the gesture imitation battery for discriminating between the dementia and CN groups and between the MCI and CN groups were 70%/88%, and 45%/75%, respectively. Ageing, male sex, and a diagnosis of dementia or MCI were associated with lower scores on the gesture imitation battery.ConclusionGesture imitation tasks alone may not be sufficient to detect MCI. However, by combining gestures with set time limits, gesture imitation tasks can be a low‐burden and effective method for detecting dementia, even in community medicine, such as during health check‐ups.
Funder
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development