Cultural adaptation and validation of the Quality of Dying in Long‐term Care (QoD‐LTC and QoD‐LTC‐C) scales by caregivers in nursing homes

Author:

Puente‐Fernández Daniel12,Soto Felipe Carmen1,Mota‐Romero Emilio123,Esteban‐Burgos Ana Alejandra24,Montoya‐Juárez Rafael125ORCID,Roldan‐Lopez de Hierro Concepción Beatriz6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing University of Granada Granada Spain

2. Health Research Institute (IBS) Granada Spain

3. Salvador Caballero Health Care Centre, Granada‐Metropolitan Primary Care District, Andalusia Health Service Granada Spain

4. Department of Nursing University of Jaén Jaén Spain

5. Mind, Brain, and Behaviour Research Centre (CIMCYC), University of Granada Granada Spain

6. Department of Statistics and Operational Research University of Granada Granada Spain

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThere is a lack of tools that can evaluate quality of dying in nursing homes from the perspective of deceased patients' caregivers. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the caregivers' versions of the Quality of Dying in Long‐Term Care (QoD‐LTC) and Quality of Dying in Long‐Term Care Complete (QoD‐LTC‐C) scales in the Spanish context.MethodsThis was a cultural adaptation and validation study. The scales were translated from English to Spanish and vice versa, and 13 experts in end‐of‐life care participated in a two‐round Delphi panel. Caregivers of 69 deceased residents from seven nursing homes in southern Spain completed both scales. Reliability, feasibility, and concurrent validity with global quality of dying perception and symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), were evaluated.ResultsSpanish caregivers' version of the QoD‐LTC scale showed good internal consistency for the total scale (α = 0.74) and each of its three factors, and good inter‐rater reliability (ICC = 0.50) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.81). The Spanish QoD‐LTC‐C scale for caregivers showed good internal consistency for the total scale (α = 0.81) and for its component factors, and good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.89) and inter‐rater reliability (ICC = 0.66). Both scales correlated with family caregivers' global perception of deceased residents' quality of dying (r = 0.39; r = 0.32), but not with the ESAS score.ConclusionsBoth scales presented an adequate factorial structure, internal consistency, and reliability to assess caregivers' perception of the quality of dying in Spanish nursing homes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3