The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review

Author:

Brown Camille1ORCID,Neerland Carrie E.1,Weinfurter Elizabeth V.2,Saftner Melissa A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Minnesota School of Nursing Minneapolis Minnesota

2. University of Minnesota Health Sciences Library Minneapolis Minnesota

Abstract

IntroductionThe recent Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health that has overruled Roe v. Wade has resulted in severe limitations of abortion access throughout the United States. Telehealth has been put forth as one solution for improving access for reproductive health care, including abortion services. Telehealth has demonstrated safety and efficacy in several health care disciplines; however, its use for abortion care and services has not been explored and synthesized.MethodsAs part of a larger review on telehealth and general reproductive health, our team identified a moderate amount of literature on telehealth and abortion care. We conducted a rapid review searching for eligible studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Information was extracted from each included study to explore 4 key areas of inquiry: (1) clinical effectiveness, (2) patient and provider experiences, (3) barriers and facilitators, and (4) the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic.ResultsTwenty‐five studies on the use of telehealth for providing abortion services published between 2011 and 2022 were included. Telehealth for medical abortion increased during the COVID‐19 pandemic and was found to be safe and clinically effective, with high patient satisfaction. Overall, telehealth improved access and removed barriers for patients including lack of transportation. Legal restrictions in certain states were cited as the primary barriers. Studies contained limited information on the perspectives and experiences of health care providers and diverse patient populations.DiscussionAbortion care via telehealth is safe and effective with high satisfaction and may also remove barriers to care including transportation and fear. Removing restrictions on telehealth for the provision of abortion services may further improve access to care and promote greater health equity.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference54 articles.

1. Increasing Access to Abortion

2. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 2022). Accessed February 1 2023.https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19‐1392_6j37.pdf

3. Public Health Experts Amicus Brief in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. (US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 2021). Accessed February 1 2023.https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19‐1392/193302/20210921172339465_19‐1392%20Brief.pdf

4. Mental Health Implications of Abortion Restrictions for Historically Marginalized Populations

5. DonovanMK.Improving Access to Abortion via Telehealth.Guttmacher Institute;2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3