Affiliation:
1. Obstetrics and Gynecology New York Presbyterian‐Hudson Valley Hospital Cortlandt Manor New York
2. Obstetrics and Gynecology NYC Health + Hospitals/Jacobi Bronx New York
3. Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York
4. NYC Health + Hospitals New York New York
5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead New York
Abstract
AbstractSince the US Supreme Court overturned Dobbs v Jackson, expanded access to abortion has been critical. Abortion is safe, and related complications are rare. The safety of abortion provision by advanced practice clinicians (APCs) is well documented. Despite the increase in targeted restrictions for patients and clinicians in many states post‐Dobbs, in recent years there have been meaningful gains in recognition and codification of abortion as part of an expanded scope of practice for APCs. Thus, creating a formal written pathway for midwives to obtain privileges in abortion provision could also improve abortion access. In New York City's public health care system, the largest in the United States, midwives provide a significant portion of perinatal and gynecologic care. Yet, until recently, a process to privilege midwives in the provision of abortion services did not exist. In response, midwives and physicians at a large New York City hospital system sought key stakeholder support to develop a pathway for certified nurse‐midwives and certified midwives, licensed midwives in New York state, to obtain the necessary training needed for independent abortion provision. This article describes the development of a midwifery‐led pilot program to improve abortion access by increasing the availability of trained midwifery abortion providers, along with the results of staff meetings exploring attitudes toward abortion care by APCs. We report our safety statistics from this pilot program and share existing evidence for safety of abortion provision by midwives and other APCs.
Subject
Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference23 articles.
1. Dobbs v Jackson 945 F3d 265 (5th Cir 2019).
2. Roe v Wade 410 US 113 (1973).
3. JonesRK WitwerE JermanJ.Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States 2017. Guttmacher Institute September 2019. Accessed February 14 2023.https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion‐incidence‐service‐availability‐us‐2017
4. NashE GuarnieriI.Six months post‐Roe 24 US states have banned abortion or are likely to do so: a roundup. Guttmacher Institute January 2023. Accessed February 8 2023.https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/01/six‐months‐post‐roe‐24‐us‐states‐have‐banned‐abortion‐or‐are‐likely‐do‐so‐roundup
5. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Roe