Privileging Midwives for Abortion Care

Author:

McNamara Keeley1ORCID,Poverman Marisa2,Nádas Marisa234,Mallow Michaela4,Gerber Sharon5

Affiliation:

1. Obstetrics and Gynecology New York Presbyterian‐Hudson Valley Hospital Cortlandt Manor New York

2. Obstetrics and Gynecology NYC Health + Hospitals/Jacobi Bronx New York

3. Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York

4. NYC Health + Hospitals New York New York

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead New York

Abstract

AbstractSince the US Supreme Court overturned Dobbs v Jackson, expanded access to abortion has been critical. Abortion is safe, and related complications are rare. The safety of abortion provision by advanced practice clinicians (APCs) is well documented. Despite the increase in targeted restrictions for patients and clinicians in many states post‐Dobbs, in recent years there have been meaningful gains in recognition and codification of abortion as part of an expanded scope of practice for APCs. Thus, creating a formal written pathway for midwives to obtain privileges in abortion provision could also improve abortion access. In New York City's public health care system, the largest in the United States, midwives provide a significant portion of perinatal and gynecologic care. Yet, until recently, a process to privilege midwives in the provision of abortion services did not exist. In response, midwives and physicians at a large New York City hospital system sought key stakeholder support to develop a pathway for certified nurse‐midwives and certified midwives, licensed midwives in New York state, to obtain the necessary training needed for independent abortion provision. This article describes the development of a midwifery‐led pilot program to improve abortion access by increasing the availability of trained midwifery abortion providers, along with the results of staff meetings exploring attitudes toward abortion care by APCs. We report our safety statistics from this pilot program and share existing evidence for safety of abortion provision by midwives and other APCs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference23 articles.

1. Dobbs v Jackson 945 F3d 265 (5th Cir 2019).

2. Roe v Wade 410 US 113 (1973).

3. JonesRK WitwerE JermanJ.Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States 2017. Guttmacher Institute September 2019. Accessed February 14 2023.https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion‐incidence‐service‐availability‐us‐2017

4. NashE GuarnieriI.Six months post‐Roe 24 US states have banned abortion or are likely to do so: a roundup. Guttmacher Institute January 2023. Accessed February 8 2023.https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/01/six‐months‐post‐roe‐24‐us‐states‐have‐banned‐abortion‐or‐are‐likely‐do‐so‐roundup

5. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Roe

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3