Midwifery and APRN Scope of Practice in Abortion Care in the Early Post‐Roe Era: Everything Old Is New Again

Author:

Jenkins Julie1ORCID,Pitney Christie2ORCID,Nuzzo Morgan3,Eagen‐Torkko Meghan45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Abortion Federation Washington District of Columbia

2. Forward Midwifery Abortion Freedom Fund Saratoga California

3. Partners in Abortion Care College Park Maryland

4. University of Washington Bothell Bothell Washington

5. Public Health Seattle‐King County Seattle Washington

Abstract

AbstractOver the past 10 years, there has been a rapid expansion of legal and legislative changes in abortion care provision for advanced practice clinicians (APCs), including nurse practitioners, midwives, and physician associates (formerly physician assistants), with most of that expansion occurring in the last several years. This expansion has occurred via several routes (eg, legislative, popular vote, court decision, attorney general opinion), and the patchwork of legal statuses nationally creates confusion for clinicians who are unclear on current regulations. This review explores the historical context of abortion practice for APCs, as well as the primary philosophical and legal concepts relevant to this role development. Since 2012, the number of states permitting abortion practice by APCs has more than quintupled, and the changes to abortion law in the United States in the wake of the 2022 Supreme Court decision in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Center creates a new imperative to understand the role of APCs in accessing abortion care. Additionally, although the research on abortion safety for APC abortion providers is well‐established, the physician‐centered paradigm of abortion care has limited the ability of APCs to develop expertise in this essential public and clinical health service.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference61 articles.

1. Dobbs State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health et al.v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 597 US (2021). Accessed December 1 2023.https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19‐1392_6j37.pdf

2. Abortion in Early America

3. Abortion, Race, and Gender in Nineteenth-Century America

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3