Communication Between Pregnant People of Color and Prenatal Care Providers in the United States: An Integrative Review

Author:

Goh Amy H.1ORCID,Altman Molly R.2ORCID,Canty Lucinda3,Edmonds Joyce K.14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Boston College Connell School of Nursing Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts

2. School of Nursing University of Washington Seattle Washington

3. College of Nursing University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts

4. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University Boston Massachusetts

Abstract

IntroductionRacism and discrimination negatively affect patient–provider communication. Yet, pregnant people of color consistently report being discriminated against, disrespected, and ignored. The purpose of this integrated review was to identify studies that examined communication between pregnant people of color and their prenatal care providers and evaluate the factors and outcomes arising from communication.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases for studies published between 2001 and 2023. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported on primary research conducted in the United States, were written in English, and focused on patient–provider communication with a sample that included pregnant people of color, defined as those who self‐identified as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latina/x/e, Indigenous, American Indian, Asian, Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander American. Twenty‐six articles were included in the review. Relevant data were extracted and compiled into an evidence table. We then applied the rating scale of the Johns Hopkins Evidence‐Based Practice model to assess the level of evidence and quality of the studies. Themes were identified using a memoing technique and organized into 3 a priori categories: factors, outcomes, and recommendations.ResultsTwo overarching themes emerged from our analysis: racism/discrimination and unmet information needs. Subthemes were then identified as factors, outcomes, or recommendations. Factors included provider behaviors, language barriers, structural barriers, provider type, continuity of care, and fear. Outcome themes were disrespect, trust, decision‐making power, missed appointments, and satisfaction with care. Lastly, culturally congruent care, provider training, and workforce development were categorized as recommendations.DiscussionInadequate communication between prenatal care providers and pregnant people of color continues to exist. Improving access to midwifery education for people of color can contribute to delivering perinatal care that is culturally and linguistically aligned. Further research about digital prenatal health communication is necessary to ensure equitable prenatal care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference70 articles.

1. Committee Opinion No. 587

2. American College of Nurse‐Midwives philosophy of midwifery.American College of Nurse‐Midwives.https://www.midwife.org/Our‐Philosophy‐of‐care

3. Development of the person-centered prenatal care scale for people of color

4. Patient-Centered Care and Outcomes

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3