A Qualitative Study of Hospitals and Payers Implementing Community Doula Support

Author:

Gebel Christina1ORCID,Larson Elysia23,Olden Heather A.4,Safon Cara B.5,Rhone Tonia J.6,Amutah‐Onukagha Ndidiamaka N.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Health Sciences Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts

4. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts

5. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts

6. Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Fairborn Ohio

7. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine Tufts University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts

Abstract

IntroductionThe impact of doula care on birth outcomes is well‐established; however, doula support remains underutilized. Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation is integral as the demand for doula care increases. The primary objective of this study was to examine doula program implementation across hospitals and payers at varying stages of implementation.MethodsRepresentatives from 4 hospitals and 2 payers participated in focus group discussions. The doula programs were categorized as anticipated, initial, and advanced implementation statuses. Coding and thematic analysis were conducted using a deductive application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.ResultsThere were 20 participants across 5 focus group discussions. Participants were mostly female, and nearly all had worked at their organization for at least 2 years. Salient themes shared across participants included valuing internal outcome data or peer‐reviewed literature to support doula care as well as anecdotal stories; the reality of the resource‐intensive nature of doula care implementation that goes beyond funding for doulas; and both the need for individual champions for change, such as midwives, and a supportive organizational culture that values health equity.DiscussionThe findings of this study highlight 3 contextual aspects that should be considered when implementing doula programs. These recommendations include: (1) use of a combination of research evidence and anecdotes when eliciting stakeholder support; (2) consideration of resources beyond funding such as program implementation support; (3) critical evaluation of organizational culture as a primary driver influencing the implementation of doula care. The future of the doula workforce in United States hospitals rests on the crux of intentional buy‐in from hospital administration and clinical providers as well as the availability of requisite resources.

Funder

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

Publisher

Wiley

Reference43 articles.

1. HoyertD.Maternal mortality rates in the United States 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Published online March 16 2023. Accessed January 9 2024.https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/124678

2. MA DPH.Massachusetts state health assessment: chapter 2. Commonwealth of Massachusetts website. Published online 2017. Accessed March 1 2022.https://www.mass.gov/doc/chapter‐2‐maternal‐infant‐and‐child‐health/download

3. Two decades of interventions in New York State to reduce maternal mortality: a systematic review

4. BeyA BrillA Porchia‐AlbertC GradillaM StraussN.Advancing Birth Jusice: Community‐Based Doula Models as a Standard of Care for Ending Racial Disparities.Every Mother Counts;2019. Accessed January 9 2024.https://everymothercounts.org/wp‐content/uploads/2019/03/Advancing‐Birth‐Justice‐CBD‐Models‐as‐Std‐of‐Care‐3‐25‐19.pdf

5. Collaboration Between Maternal and Child Health and Chronic Disease Epidemiologists to Identify Strategies to Reduce Hypertension-Related Severe Maternal Morbidity

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3