Retroperitoneal cutaneous ureterostomy following radical cystectomy: A multicenter comparative study of robotic versus open surgery

Author:

Sasaki Yutaro1ORCID,Fukuta Kyotaro2,Kadoriku Fumiya3,Daizumoto Kei1,Shiozaki Keito2ORCID,Tomida Ryotaro1,Kusuhara Yoshito1,Fukawa Tomoya1ORCID,Yanagihara Yutaka3,Nakanishi Ryoichi2,Yamaguchi Kunihisa1,Yamamoto Yasuyo1,Izaki Hirofumi2,Takahashi Masayuki1,Okamoto Kenjiro3,Furukawa Junya1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima Japan

2. Department of Urology Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital Tokushima Japan

3. Department of Urology Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital Matsuyama Japan

Abstract

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in perioperative outcomes of cutaneous ureterostomy (CUS) between open surgery (open radical cystectomy, ORC) and robot‐assisted surgery (robot‐assisted radical cystectomy, RARC), including the stent‐free rate, readmission rates due to urinary tract infection (UTI), and changes in renal function.MethodsBetween 2005 and 2023, a total of 37 patients underwent CUS following ORC, while 24 patients underwent CUS following RARC. Perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups.ResultsThe patients in the RARC group were significantly older (p = 0.007) and had a significantly higher proportion of high‐risk cases with ASA‐PS ≥3 (p = 0.002). In addition, RARC was associated with a significantly lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.001) and a reduced transfusion rate (p = 0.003). Postoperative complication rates and the stent‐free rate were comparable between the ORC and RARC groups. Throughout a median follow‐up period of 2.6 years, rates of readmission due to UTI did not differ significantly between the two groups. Moreover, there were no differences in the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate before and after surgery and the 3‐year survival rates were similar across both groups.ConclusionsCUS following RARC appears to offer a safer alternative compared with CUS following ORC, and the stent‐free rates are comparable. The significantly lower estimated blood loss and transfusion rate associated with RARC are particularly favorable for elderly patients, those who are frail, and individuals with multiple comorbidities.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3