Affiliation:
1. Department of Reproduction and Genetics Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Jinan China
2. Women's Health Department Jinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University Jinan China
Abstract
AbstractCaesarean section rate is increasing and postoperative wound infection is a major health‐threatening complication after caesarean section (CS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Cefazolin at different time for post‐caesarean delivery. The aim of this study was to compare the use of Cefazolin at different times on infections after CS. The time of antibiotic use in CS can be divided into two groups: before skin incision (SI) and after cord clamping (CC). In this study, 268 relevant articles were found in the database, and finally, 10 articles were analysed. This study included a total of 5256 cases of caesarean section. The data on wound infections, endometritis, urinary tract infections and fever were analysed. Perform an analysis of the data using RevMan 5.3. The results showed that cefazolin before SI reduced wound infection compared to after CC (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37–0.69; p < 0.0001). Cefazolin prophylactically used before SI reduce endometritis after CS compared to after CC (OR, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.35–0.77; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in urinary tract infections after CS between cefazolin prophylactically used before SI and after CC (OR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.50–11.28; p = 0.35). There was no significant difference in fever after CS between the prophylactic use of cefazolin before SI and after CC (OR, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.26–11.43; p = 0.225). Cefazolin before SI reduces wound infection and endometritis after CS.