Passive acoustic data yields insights into bird vocalization behavior associated with invasive shrub removal

Abstract

AbstractMonitoring biodiversity changes associated with ecological restoration is crucial in the current UN Decade on Restoration. Although several studies highlight the impacts of restoration on ecosystems, it is also important to understand how restoration alters species' behavior, including vocalization. Advances in conservation technology, such as passive acoustic monitoring, facilitate rapid and noninvasive monitoring. In this study, we quantified changes in the vocal behavior of a bird species in response to small‐scale restoration carried out by removing the invasive shrub, Lantana camara (lantana), in a Central Indian tropical dry forest. We examined associations between sites of varying lantana densities and the vocalization of one of its primary dispersers, red‐vented bulbul (RVBU). We found statistically significant differences in note‐length and bandwidth of RVBU vocalizations across sites. A random forest classification model showed that Lantana density was not an important predictor of RVBU vocalizations. Apart from the percentage of forest area and farms in our sites, total human population was the most important predictor for RVBU vocalizations suggesting RVBU's use of human habitations as possible resource hubs. Our findings suggest that lantana removal is not associated with significant changes in RVBU vocalization. This study provides empirical evidence that ecological restoration may not alter species' vocalization in the short term and highlights the importance of moving beyond species presence and understanding the impact of restoration on species behavior.