Safety and efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of perimenstrual migraine attacks: A post hoc analysis

Author:

MacGregor E. Anne12ORCID,Hutchinson Susan3ORCID,Lai Hongxin4,Dabruzzo Brett4,Yu Sung Yun4,Trugman Joel M.4,Ailani Jessica5

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry London UK

2. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital London UK

3. Orange County Migraine and Headache Center Irvine California USA

4. AbbVie Madison New Jersey USA

5. Department of Neurology MedStar Georgetown University Hospital DC Washington USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of perimenstrual migraine (pmM) attacks.BackgroundUbrogepant is an oral calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine in adults.MethodsAfter completing one of two phase 3 trials, participants could enroll in a phase 3, 52‐week, open‐label, long‐term safety extension trial and were re‐randomized 1:1:1 to usual care, ubrogepant 50 mg, or ubrogepant 100 mg. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of ubrogepant in a subset of women who treated ≥1 pmM or non‐pmM attack with ubrogepant. A pmM attack started on or between 2 days before and the first 3 days of menstrual bleeding. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) percentages of ubrogepant‐treated attacks achieving 2‐h pain freedom and pain relief were reported, with outcomes weighted equally by participant.ResultsOf 734 women in the modified intent‐to‐treat population, 354 reported ≥1 menstrual cycle start date and a ubrogepant‐treated headache day in the same month. A qualifying pmM and non‐pmM attack was reported by 278 and 716 women, respectively. Pain freedom at 2 h was achieved in a mean (SD) of 28.7% (37.4) of pmM attacks and 22.1% (26.9) of non‐pmM attacks treated with ubrogepant 50 mg (p = 0.054) and 29.7% (35.2) versus 25.3% (26.3) of attacks treated with ubrogepant 100 mg (p = 0.757). No difference was found in the mean percentage of ubrogepant‐treated pmM and non‐pmM attacks that achieved 2‐h pain relief with ubrogepant 50 mg (64.8% [39.9] vs. 65.2% [32.4]; p = 0.683) and with 100 mg (67.1% [37.4] vs. 68.4% [30.2]; p = 0.273). Treatment‐related treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported by 8.8% (12/137) and 12.8% (18/141) in the ubrogepant 50 and 100 mg pmM subgroups, respectively.ConclusionsUbrogepant demonstrated similar efficacy for the treatment of pmM and non‐pmM attacks. No new safety signals were identified.

Funder

AbbVie

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3