Teaching robotic cystectomy: prospective pilot clinical validation of the ERUS training curriculum

Author:

Diamand Romain1,D'Hondt Frederiek23,Mjaess Georges1ORCID,Jabbour Teddy1,Dell'Oglio Paolo4ORCID,Larcher Alessandro5,Moschini Marco5,Quackels Thierry1,Peltier Alexandre1,Assenmacher Gregoire1,Wiklund Peter6,Breda Alberto7,Turri Filippo8,De Groote Ruben23ORCID,Mottrie Alexandre23,Roumeguere Thierry1,Albisinni Simone19ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Urology Department, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles Université libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium

2. Department of Urology Onze‐Lieve‐Vrouwziekenhuis Aalst Belgium

3. ORSI Academy Melle Belgium

4. Department of Urology ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Milan Italy

5. Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

6. Department of Urology Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai NY USA

7. Departement of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

8. Unit of Urology ‐ ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo ‐ University La Statale Milan Italy

9. Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome Italy

Abstract

ObjectiveTo provide the first clinical validation of the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) curriculum for training in robot‐assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC).Patients and MethodsThe ERUS proposed a structured curriculum, divided into 11 steps, to train novice surgeons and help overcome the steep learning curve associated with iRARC. In this study, one trainee completed the curriculum under the mentorship of an expert. Twenty‐one patients were operated on by the trainee following the proposed iRARC curriculum [(t)iRARC group] and were compared with 42 patients treated with the standard of care by the mentor [(m)iRARC group]. To evaluate curriculum safety, peri‐operative outcomes, surgical margins and complications were assessed. Propensity‐score matching (1:2) was used to identify comparable (t)iRARC and (m)iRARC cases. Matched variables included age, body mass index, neoadjuvant therapy, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and cT stage. Mann–Whitney and chi‐squared tests were used to compare peri‐ and postoperative outcomes between the two cohorts. To evaluate curriculum efficacy, steps attempted and completed by the trainee were assessed and studied as a function of growing surgical experience of the trainee.ResultsThe trainee progressed in proficiency‐based training through steps of increasing difficulty. No differences in estimated blood loss, positive soft tissue margins, number of resected lymph nodes, overall and high‐grade complications, or 90‐day readmissions between the (t)iRARC and (m)iRARC groups were observed (all P > 0.05). However, operating time was significantly longer in the (t)iRARC group (P = 0.01). Of the 209 available steps, the trainee attempted 168 (80%) and successfully performed 125 (60%). Increasing experience was associated with more steps being successfully performed (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe proposed ERUS curriculum assists naïve surgeons during the learning curve for iRARC and should be encouraged in order to guarantee optimal outcomes during the learning phase of this procedure.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3