Machine‐based learning of multidimensional data in bipolar disorder – pilot results

Author:

Birner Armin1ORCID,Mairinger Marco1ORCID,Elst Clemens2,Maget Alexander1,Fellendorf Frederike T.1ORCID,Platzer Martina1,Queissner Robert1ORCID,Lenger Melanie1,Tmava‐Berisha Adelina1,Bengesser Susanne A.1,Reininghaus Eva Z.1ORCID,Kreuzthaler Markus2ORCID,Dalkner Nina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

2. Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation Medical University of Graz Graz Austria

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionOwing to the heterogenic picture of bipolar disorder, it takes approximately 8.8 years to reach a correct diagnosis. Early recognition and early intervention might not only increase quality of life, but also increase life expectancy as a whole in individuals with bipolar disorder. Therefore, we hypothesize that implementing machine learning techniques can be used to support the diagnostic process of bipolar disorder and minimize misdiagnosis rates.Materials and MethodsTo test this hypothesis, a de‐identified data set of only demographic information and the results of cognitive tests of 196 patients with bipolar disorder and 145 healthy controls was used to train and compare five different machine learning algorithms.ResultsThe best performing algorithm was logistic regression, with a macro‐average F1‐score of 0.69 [95% CI 0.66–0.73]. After further optimization, a model with an improved macro‐average F1‐score of 0.75, a micro‐average F1‐score of 0.77, and an AUROC of 0.84 was built. Furthermore, the individual amount of contribution per variable on the classification was assessed, which revealed that body mass index, results of the Stroop test, and the d2‐R test alone allow for a classification of bipolar disorder with equal performance.ConclusionUsing these data for clinical application results in an acceptable performance, but has not yet reached a state where it can sufficiently augment a diagnosis made by an experienced clinician. Therefore, further research should focus on identifying variables with the highest amount of contribution to a model's classification.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3