Routine and sleep EEG: Minimum recording standards of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and the International League Against Epilepsy

Author:

Peltola Maria E.1ORCID,Leitinger Markus2ORCID,Halford Jonathan J.3ORCID,Vinayan Kollencheri Puthenveettil4ORCID,Kobayashi Katsuhiro5,Pressler Ronit M.6ORCID,Mindruta Ioana7ORCID,Mayor Luis Carlos8ORCID,Lauronen Leena1ORCID,Beniczky Sándor9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. HUS Diagnostic Center, Clinical Neurophysiology, Clinical Neurosciences, Epilepsia Helsinki Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

2. Department of Neurology Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg Austria

3. Department of Neurology Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA

4. Department of Pediatric Neurology Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Cochin Kerala India

5. Department of Child Neurology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

6. Clinical Neuroscience, UCL‐Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London UK

7. Department of Neurology University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest and University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest Romania

8. Department of Neurology Hospital Universitario Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota Bogota Colombia

9. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, and Danish Epilepsy Centre Dianalund Denmark

Abstract

AbstractThis article provides recommendations on the minimum standards for recording routine (“standard”) and sleep electroencephalography (EEG). The joint working group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) and the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed the standards according to the methodology suggested for epilepsy‐related clinical practice guidelines by the Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group. We reviewed the published evidence using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of evidence for sleep induction methods was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method. A tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS‐2) was used to assess the risk of bias in technical and methodological studies. Where high‐quality published evidence was lacking, we used modified Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. The GRADE system was used to formulate the recommendations. The quality of evidence was low or moderate. We formulated 16 consensus‐based recommendations for minimum standards for recording routine and sleep EEG. The recommendations comprise the following aspects: indications, technical standards, recording duration, sleep induction, and provocative methods.

Funder

Evelyn Trust

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3