Patterns of national emergency department utilization by fee‐for‐service Medicare beneficiaries with dementia

Author:

Bowman Jason K.123ORCID,Ritchie Christine S.34,Ouchi Kei13,Tulsky James A.23,Teno Joan M.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Brown University School of Public Health Providence Rhode Island USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIndividuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) often face high acute care clinical utilization and costs with unclear benefits in survival or quality of life. The emergency department (ED) is frequently the site of pivotal decisions in these acute care episodes. This study uses national Medicare data to explore this population's ED utilization.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of persons aged ≥66 years enrolled in traditional Medicare with a Chronic Condition Warehouse diagnosis of dementia. Primary 1‐year outcome measures included ED visits with and without hospitalization, ED visits per 100 days alive, and health‐care costs. A multivariate random effects regression model (clustered by county of residence), adjusted for sociodemographics and comorbidities, examined how place of care on January 1, 2018, was associated with subsequent ED utilization.ResultsIn 2018, 2,680,006 ADRD traditional Medicare patients (mean age 82.9, 64.2% female, 9.4% Black, 6.2% Hispanic) experienced a total of 3,234,767 ED visits. Over half (52.2%) of the cohort experienced one ED visit, 15.5% experienced three or more, and 37.1% of ED visits resulted in hospitalization. Compared with ADRD patients residing at home without services, the marginal difference in ED visits per 100 days alive varied by location of care. Highest differences were observed for those with hospitalizations (0.48 visits per 100 days alive, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.49), skilled nursing facility (rehab/skilled nursing facility [SNF]) stays (0.27, 95% CI 0.27–0.28), home health stays (0.25, 95% CI 0.25–0.26), or observation stays (0.82, 95% CI 0.77–0.87). Similar patterns were observed with ED use without hospitalization and health‐care costs.ConclusionsPersons with ADRD frequently use the ED—particularly those with recent hospitalizations, rehab/SNF stays, or home health use—and may benefit from targeted interventions during or before the ED encounters to reduce avoidable utilization and ensure goal‐concordant care.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3