A randomized controlled trial of a novel home‐based palliative care program: A report of a trial that could not be completed

Author:

Goldstein Nathan E.12ORCID,Winter Shira3,Mather Harriet1,DeCherrie Linda V.14,Kelley Amy S.15ORCID,McKendrick Karen1,Zhao Duzhi1,Espino Christian1,Sealy LaToya1,Zhang Meng1,Morrison R. Sean15

Affiliation:

1. Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA

2. Department of Medicine Dartmouth Health and the Geisel School of Medicine Hanover New Hampshire USA

3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA

4. Medically Home Boston Massachusetts USA

5. James J Peters VA Medical Center Bronx New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn response to a growing need for accessible, efficient, and effective palliative care services, we designed, implemented, and evaluated a novel palliative care at home (PC@H) model for people with serious illness that is centered around a community health worker, a registered nurse, and a social worker, with an advanced practice nurse and a physician for support. Our objectives were to measure the impact of receipt of PC@H on patient symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare utilization and costs.MethodsWe enrolled 136 patients with serious illness in this parallel, randomized controlled trial. Our primary outcome was change in symptom burden at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included change in symptom burden at 3 months, change in quality of life at 6 weeks and 3 months, estimated using a group t‐test. In an exploratory aim, we examined the impact of PC@H on healthcare utilization and cost using a generalized linear model.ResultsPC@H resulted in a greater improvement in patient symptoms at 6 weeks (1.30 score improvement, n = 37) and 3 months (3.14 score improvement, n = 21) compared with controls. There were no differences in healthcare utilization and costs between the two groups. Unfortunately, due to the COVID‐19 pandemic and a loss of funding, the trial was not able to be completed as originally intended.ConclusionsA palliative care at home model that leverages community health workers, registered nurses, and social workers as the primary deliverers of care may result in improved patient symptoms and quality of life compared with standard care. We did not demonstrate significant differences in healthcare utilization and cost associated with receipt of PC@H, likely due to inability to reach the intended sample size and insufficient statistical power, due to elements beyond the investigators' control such as the COVID‐19 public health emergency and changes in grant funding.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Fan Fox and Leslie R. Samuels Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference31 articles.

1. Barriers to Access to Palliative Care

2. Improving Support for Family Caregivers of People with a Serious Illness in the United States: Strategic Agenda and Call to Action

3. Concepts of Community‐Based Palliative Care Program Design 101.Center to advance palliative care.2024.https://www.capc.org/toolkits/concepts‐of‐community‐based‐palliative‐care‐program‐design‐101/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3