The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial

Published:2019-03-12 Issue:8 Volume:98 Page:1032-1039
ISSN:0001-6349
Container-title:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
language:en
Short-container-title:Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

Author:

Hokkila Emma¹^ORCID,Kruit Heidi²³^ORCID,Rahkonen Leena²³^ORCID,Timonen Susanna⁴,Mattila Mirjami⁴,Laatio Liisa⁵,Ordén Maija‐Riitta⁶^ORCID,Uotila Jukka⁷^ORCID,Luukkaala Tiina⁸⁹,Tihtonen Kati⁷^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Lapland Central Hospital Rovaniemi Finland

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland

3. Helsinki University Helsinki Finland

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Turku University Hospital Turku Finland

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Oulu University Hospital Oulu Finland

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Kuopio University Hospital Kuopio Finland

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland

8. Health Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences Tampere University Tampere Finland

9. Research, Development and Innovation Center Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/aogs.13580

Reference22 articles.

1. Global Perspectives on Elective Induction of Labor

2. European Perinatal Health Report: Health and Care of pregnant women and babies in Europe in 2010.http://europeristat.com/. Accessed May 27 2013.

3. Finnish National Institute of Health and Welfare.Perinatal Statistics: parturients delivers and newborns 2016. Statistical report 37/2017.http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/135445/Tr_37_17.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed October 31 2017.

4. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

5. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour;Alfirevic Z;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of Misoprostol for Labor Induction: Vaginal InsertVersusOral Application Concerning Efficiency and Safety;In Vivo;2024

2. Induction of Labor;Queenan's Management of High‐Risk Pregnancy;2023-12

3. Vaginal Compared With Oral Misoprostol Induction at Term;Obstetrics & Gynecology;2023-11-21

4. Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol;Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences;2023-07-13

5. Pharmacological Interventions in Labor and Delivery;Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology;2023-01-20