Affiliation:
1. Department of Dermatology University Hospitals of Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus Kiel Kiel Germany
2. Institute of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité Berlin Germany
3. Leibniz Institute DSMZ, German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH Braunschweig Germany
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundFungi clinically relevant to human skin comprise prevalent commensals and well‐known pathogens. Only rarely human skin harbours fungi that evade identification.ObjectiveTo characterise an enigmatic specimen isolated from a skin lesion.MethodsA comprehensive clinical and mycological workup including conventional methods for phenotypic characterisation and sequencing based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and large subunit (LSU) regions to infer a phylogenetic tree.ResultsCultures on common solid media were macroscopically inconspicuous initially until mycelial tufts developed on the surface, notably on potato dextrose agar. Polymorphous chlamydospores were detected but no aleurospores and ascomata. At 26°C, the isolate grew on standard agars, plant materials and garden soil and utilised peptone, keratins, lipids, inulin, erythrocytes and cellulose. It also grew at 5°C and at 37°C. Nucleotide sequences of its ITS region showed 93% similarity to sequences of different Malbranchea species. The closest matches among LSU rRNA sequences were obtained with the genera Amauroascus, Arthroderma, Auxarthronopsis and Malbranchea (93%–95%). A combined phylogenetic analysis placed the fungus in a sister clade to Neogymnomycetaceae, classified as incertae sedis in Onygenales, on a large distance to either Diploospora rosea or ‘Amauroascus’ aureus.ConclusionsThe genus Inopinatus gen. nov. (MB854685) with the species Inopinatus corneliae sp. nov. (MB854687) is introduced to accommodate our isolate (holotype: DSM 116806; isotypes: CBS 151104, IHEM 29063). Probably Inopinatus corneliae is a geophilic species that, although potentially harmful, was no relevant pathogen in our case. Its ecology, epidemiology and pathogenicity need to be further clarified.
Reference32 articles.
1. CampbellCK JohnsonEM PhilpotCM WarnockDW eds.Identification of Pathogenic Fungi. Public Health Laboratory Service1996.
2. deHoogGS GuarroJ GenéJ FiguerasMJ.Atlas of clinical fungi. Web version July 10. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures Universitat Rovira i Vigili Reus Spain.2024.
3. Dermatophytenspezies