Anterior segment optical coherence tomography meibography compared with keratograph meibography

Author:

Edgar Amanda K.12ORCID,Connor Heather R. M.1,Kamarelddin Shayma1,Musich Jack1,Mclouta Stefanos1,Choi Evelyn1,Thamer Afnan1,Salcedo Adrian1,Nazarian Aram1,Chong Luke X.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine (Optometry), Faculty of Health Deakin University Waurn Ponds Victoria Australia

2. Digital Learning, Deakin Learning Futures Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using readily accessible technology, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS‐OCT), to detect and grade meibomian gland dropout and examine its interchangeability with the Oculus Keratograph 5M (K5M).MethodsA total of 30 participants (30 eyes) with a median age of 21 (range = 19–28 years) were recruited. Meibography was performed using two commercially available imaging devices to look at the structure of the meibomian glands and grade them subjectively in real time, and image analysis was used to quantify meibomian gland loss objectively. Gland loss as imaged by the two techniques was graded using the meiboscore grading schema. Test–retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Weighted kappa was used to evaluate agreement between the two imaging devices and four methods of image analysis. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine the association of structural measurements between each of the techniques. The agreement between the two imaging techniques was determined with the Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsReliability of subjective grading was strong for AS‐OCT (ICC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83–0.96, p < 0.001) and K5M (ICC: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.96–0.91, p = 0.001). Image analysis with ImageJ reliability was strong between the imaging devices (ICC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.55–0.94, p < 0.001). Agreement between each subjective technique was fair, κ = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.17–0.73, p < 0.001) and a positive Spearman correlation was also observed (r = 0.52, p < 0.001).There was no significant difference between the mean meibomian gland loss measured with ImageJ between AS‐OCT and K5M (0.92 ± 6.28, p = 0.26). The 95% limits of agreement were −12.45% to +14.04%.ConclusionThese findings suggest subjective real‐time grading of meibomian gland loss could be performed using readily available AS‐OCT technology and that this method was interchangeable with the K5M.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sensory Systems,Optometry,Ophthalmology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3